TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting recovery in patients with mild traumatic brain injury and a normal CT using serum biomarkers and diffusion tensor imaging (CENTER-TBI)
T2 - an observational cohort study
AU - Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CENTER-TBI MRI) Substudy Participants and Investigators
AU - Richter, Sophie
AU - Winzeck, Stefan
AU - Correia, Marta M.
AU - Czeiter, Endre
AU - Whitehouse, Daniel
AU - Kornaropoulos, Evgenios N.
AU - Williams, Guy B.
AU - Verheyden, Jan
AU - Das, Tilak
AU - Tenovuo, Olli
AU - Posti, Jussi P.
AU - Vik, Anne
AU - Moen, Kent Gøran
AU - Håberg, Asta K.
AU - Wang, Kevin
AU - Buki, Andras
AU - Maas, Andrew
AU - Steyerberg, Ewout
AU - Menon, David K.
AU - Newcombe, Virginia F.J.
AU - Amrein, Krisztina
AU - Andelic, Nada
AU - Andreassen, Lasse
AU - Anke, Audny
AU - Azouvi, Philippe
AU - Bellander, Bo Michael
AU - Benali, Habib
AU - Caccioppola, Alessio
AU - Calappi, Emiliana
AU - Carbonara, Marco
AU - Citerio, Giuseppe
AU - Clusmann, Hans
AU - Coburn, Mark
AU - Coles, Jonathan
AU - Correia, Marta
AU - De Keyser, Véronique
AU - Degos, Vincent
AU - Depreitere, Bart
AU - Eikenes, Live
AU - Ezer, Erzsébet
AU - Foks, Kelly
AU - Frisvold, Shirin
AU - Galanaud, Damien
AU - Ghuysen, Alexandre
AU - Glocker, Ben
AU - Haberg, Asta
AU - Haitsma, Iain
AU - Helseth, Eirik
AU - Hutchinson, Peter J.
AU - Rueckert, Daniel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Background: Even patients with normal computed tomography (CT) head imaging may experience persistent symptoms for months to years after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). There is currently no good way to predict recovery and triage patients who may benefit from early follow-up and targeted intervention. We aimed to assess if existing prognostic models can be improved by serum biomarkers or diffusion tensor imaging metrics (DTI) from MRI, and if serum biomarkers can identify patients for DTI. Methods: We included 1025 patients aged >18 years with a Glasgow Coma Score >12 and normal CT from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study which recruited between December 19,2014 and December 17, 2017 (NCT02210221). Biomarkers (GFAP, NFL, S100B) were obtained at a median of 8.8 h (Q1–Q3 4.2–16.7) and DTI at 13 days (3–19) after injury. DTI metrics were available in 153 patients for 48 white matter tracts (ICBM-DTI-81 atlas). Incomplete recovery at three months was defined as an extended Glasgow Outcome Scale score <8. Existing prognostic models were fitted with and without biomarkers, or with and without DTI, and internally validated using bootstrapping. Findings: 385 (38%) patients had incomplete recovery. Adding biomarkers did not improve performance beyond the best existing clinical prognostic model [optimism-corrected AUC 0.69 (95% CI 0.65–0.72) and R2 17% (11–22)]. Adding DTI metrics significantly enhanced all models [best optimism-corrected AUC 0.82 (0.79–0.85) and R2 75% (39–100)]. The top three prognostic tracts were the left posterior thalamic radiation, left superior cerebellar peduncle and right uncinate fasciculus. Serum biomarkers could have avoided 1 in 5 DTI scans, with GFAP <12 h and NFL 12–24 h from injury performing best. Interpretation: DTI substantially improved existing prognostic models for functional outcome in patients with mTBI and a normal CT, and biomarkers could help select patients for MRI. If validated, DTI could allow for targeted follow-up and enrichment of clinical trials of early interventions to improve outcome. Funding: EU Seventh Framework Programme, Hannelore Kohl Stiftung, One Mind, Integra LifeSciences, NeuroTrauma Sciences.
AB - Background: Even patients with normal computed tomography (CT) head imaging may experience persistent symptoms for months to years after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). There is currently no good way to predict recovery and triage patients who may benefit from early follow-up and targeted intervention. We aimed to assess if existing prognostic models can be improved by serum biomarkers or diffusion tensor imaging metrics (DTI) from MRI, and if serum biomarkers can identify patients for DTI. Methods: We included 1025 patients aged >18 years with a Glasgow Coma Score >12 and normal CT from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study which recruited between December 19,2014 and December 17, 2017 (NCT02210221). Biomarkers (GFAP, NFL, S100B) were obtained at a median of 8.8 h (Q1–Q3 4.2–16.7) and DTI at 13 days (3–19) after injury. DTI metrics were available in 153 patients for 48 white matter tracts (ICBM-DTI-81 atlas). Incomplete recovery at three months was defined as an extended Glasgow Outcome Scale score <8. Existing prognostic models were fitted with and without biomarkers, or with and without DTI, and internally validated using bootstrapping. Findings: 385 (38%) patients had incomplete recovery. Adding biomarkers did not improve performance beyond the best existing clinical prognostic model [optimism-corrected AUC 0.69 (95% CI 0.65–0.72) and R2 17% (11–22)]. Adding DTI metrics significantly enhanced all models [best optimism-corrected AUC 0.82 (0.79–0.85) and R2 75% (39–100)]. The top three prognostic tracts were the left posterior thalamic radiation, left superior cerebellar peduncle and right uncinate fasciculus. Serum biomarkers could have avoided 1 in 5 DTI scans, with GFAP <12 h and NFL 12–24 h from injury performing best. Interpretation: DTI substantially improved existing prognostic models for functional outcome in patients with mTBI and a normal CT, and biomarkers could help select patients for MRI. If validated, DTI could allow for targeted follow-up and enrichment of clinical trials of early interventions to improve outcome. Funding: EU Seventh Framework Programme, Hannelore Kohl Stiftung, One Mind, Integra LifeSciences, NeuroTrauma Sciences.
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Concussion
KW - Imaging
KW - Outcome
KW - Prognostication
KW - Traumatic brain injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202063072&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102751
DO - 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102751
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85202063072
SN - 2589-5370
VL - 75
JO - eClinicalMedicine
JF - eClinicalMedicine
M1 - 102751
ER -