Practical differential profiling

Martin Schulz, Bronis R. De Supinski

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Comparing performance profiles from two runs is an essential performance analysis step that users routinely perform. In this work we present eGprof a tool that facilitates these comparisons through differential profiling inside gprof. We chose this approach, rather than designing a new tool, since gprof is one of the few performance analysis tools accepted and used by a large community of users. eGprof allows users to "subtract" two performance profiles directly. It also includes callgraph visualization to highlight the differences in graphical form. Along with the design of this tool, we present several case studies that show how eGprof can be used to find and to study the differences of two application executions quickly and hence can aid the user in this most common step in performance analysis. We do this without requiring major changes on the side of the user, the most important factor in guaranteeing the adoption of our tool by code teams.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEuro-Par 2007 Parallel Processing - 13th International Euro-Par Conference, Proceedings
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages97-106
Number of pages10
ISBN (Print)9783540744658
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes
Event13th International Euro-Par Conference on Parallel Processing, Euro-Par 2007 - Rennes, France
Duration: 28 Aug 200731 Aug 2007

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume4641 LNCS
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Conference

Conference13th International Euro-Par Conference on Parallel Processing, Euro-Par 2007
Country/TerritoryFrance
CityRennes
Period28/08/0731/08/07

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Practical differential profiling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this