Possibilities and limitations of spatially explicit site index modelling for spruce based on national forest inventory data and digital maps of soil and climate in Bavaria (SE Germany)

Susanne Brandl, Wolfgang Falk, Hans Joachim Klemmt, Georg Stricker, Andreas Bender, Thomas Rötzer, Hans Pretzsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Combining national forest inventory (NFI) data with digital site maps of high resolution enables spatially explicit predictions of site productivity. The aim of this study is to explore the possibilities and limitations of this database to analyze the environmental dependency of height-growth of Norway spruce and to predict site index (SI) on a scale that is relevant for local forest management. The study region is the German federal state of Bavaria. The exploratory methods comprise significance tests and hypervolume-analysis. SI is modeled with a Generalized Additive Model (GAM). In a second step the residuals are modeled using Boosted Regression Trees (BRT). The interaction between temperature regime and water supply strongly determined height growth. At sites with very similar temperature regime and water supply, greater heights were reached if the depth gradient of base saturation was favorable. Statistical model criteria (Double Penalty Selection, AIC) preferred composite variables for water supply and the supply of basic cations. The ability to predict SI on a local scale was limited due to the difficulty to integrate soil variables into the model.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2626-2646
Number of pages21
JournalForests
Volume5
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Climate
  • Forest inventory
  • Height growth
  • Soil
  • Statistical model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Possibilities and limitations of spatially explicit site index modelling for spruce based on national forest inventory data and digital maps of soil and climate in Bavaria (SE Germany)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this