TY - JOUR
T1 - Plant species composition and local habitat conditions as primary determinants of terrestrial arthropod assemblages
AU - Tobisch, Cynthia
AU - Rojas-Botero, Sandra
AU - Uhler, Johannes
AU - Müller, Jörg
AU - Kollmann, Johannes
AU - Moning, Christoph
AU - Brändle, Martin
AU - Gossner, Martin M.
AU - Redlich, Sarah
AU - Zhang, Jie
AU - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf
AU - Benjamin, Caryl
AU - Englmeier, Jana
AU - Fricke, Ute
AU - Ganuza, Cristina
AU - Haensel, Maria
AU - Riebl, Rebekka
AU - Uphus, Lars
AU - Ewald, Jörg
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Arthropods respond to vegetation in multiple ways since plants provide habitat and food resources and indicate local abiotic conditions. However, the relative importance of these factors for arthropod assemblages is less well understood. We aimed to disentangle the effects of plant species composition and environmental drivers on arthropod taxonomic composition and to assess which aspects of vegetation contribute to the relationships between plant and arthropod assemblages. In a multi-scale field study in Southern Germany, we sampled vascular plants and terrestrial arthropods in typical habitats of temperate landscapes. We compared independent and shared effects of vegetation and abiotic predictors on arthropod composition distinguishing between four large orders (Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Diptera), and five functional groups (herbivores, pollinators, predators, parasitoids, detritivores). Across all investigated groups, plant species composition explained the major fraction of variation in arthropod composition, while land-cover composition was another important predictor. Moreover, the local habitat conditions depicted by the indicator values of the plant communities were more important for arthropod composition than trophic relationships between certain plant and arthropod species. Among trophic groups, predators showed the strongest response to plant species composition, while responses of herbivores and pollinators were stronger than those of parasitoids and detritivores. Our results highlight the relevance of plant community composition for terrestrial arthropod assemblages across multiple taxa and trophic levels and emphasize the value of plants as a proxy for characterizing habitat conditions that are hardly accessible to direct environmental measurements.
AB - Arthropods respond to vegetation in multiple ways since plants provide habitat and food resources and indicate local abiotic conditions. However, the relative importance of these factors for arthropod assemblages is less well understood. We aimed to disentangle the effects of plant species composition and environmental drivers on arthropod taxonomic composition and to assess which aspects of vegetation contribute to the relationships between plant and arthropod assemblages. In a multi-scale field study in Southern Germany, we sampled vascular plants and terrestrial arthropods in typical habitats of temperate landscapes. We compared independent and shared effects of vegetation and abiotic predictors on arthropod composition distinguishing between four large orders (Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Diptera), and five functional groups (herbivores, pollinators, predators, parasitoids, detritivores). Across all investigated groups, plant species composition explained the major fraction of variation in arthropod composition, while land-cover composition was another important predictor. Moreover, the local habitat conditions depicted by the indicator values of the plant communities were more important for arthropod composition than trophic relationships between certain plant and arthropod species. Among trophic groups, predators showed the strongest response to plant species composition, while responses of herbivores and pollinators were stronger than those of parasitoids and detritivores. Our results highlight the relevance of plant community composition for terrestrial arthropod assemblages across multiple taxa and trophic levels and emphasize the value of plants as a proxy for characterizing habitat conditions that are hardly accessible to direct environmental measurements.
KW - Community ecology
KW - Ellenberg indicator values
KW - Functional groups
KW - Plant–insect interactions
KW - Species-environment relationships
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149258009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00442-023-05345-6
DO - 10.1007/s00442-023-05345-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85149258009
SN - 0029-8549
VL - 201
SP - 813
EP - 825
JO - Oecologia
JF - Oecologia
IS - 3
ER -