TY - JOUR
T1 - Phototherapy with LED light modulates healing processes in an in vitro scratch-wound model using 3 different cell types
AU - Teuschl, Andreas
AU - Balmayor, Elizabeth Rosado
AU - Redl, Heinz
AU - Van Griensven, Martijn
AU - Dungel, Peter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/2/13
Y1 - 2015/2/13
N2 - BACKGROUND: An effective way of modulating wound healing processes, including proliferation and apoptosis, is low-level light therapy. Because of several disadvantages of lasers, light-emitting diodes (LEDs) could be more feasible light sources. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the effects of blue and red light from LEDs on different cell types in an in vitro scratch-wound model. METHODS: Monolayers of C2C12 myoblasts, NIH/3T3 fibroblasts, and BICR10 keratinocytes were injured by mechanical scraping. Cells were illuminated on 5 consecutive days for 10 minutes by LED at 470 or 630 nm. Effects of light on in vitro wound healing were evaluated by analyzing time to closure, proliferation, apoptosis, and necrosis rates. RESULTS: Illumination substantially affected cell viability and cell growth. Blue light strongly decreased proliferation and augmented apoptosis in all 3 cell types and increased necrosis rates in C2C12 and NIH/3T3 cells. In contrast, red light did not alter apoptosis in either cell type but promoted proliferation in all 3 cell types with significant effects in C2C12 and NIH/3T3 cells and shortened time to closure in all 3 cell types. CONCLUSION: Light-emitting diode light illumination could be a therapeutic option and positively affect wound healing processes. By choosing appropriate wavelengths, variable effects can be achieved.
AB - BACKGROUND: An effective way of modulating wound healing processes, including proliferation and apoptosis, is low-level light therapy. Because of several disadvantages of lasers, light-emitting diodes (LEDs) could be more feasible light sources. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the effects of blue and red light from LEDs on different cell types in an in vitro scratch-wound model. METHODS: Monolayers of C2C12 myoblasts, NIH/3T3 fibroblasts, and BICR10 keratinocytes were injured by mechanical scraping. Cells were illuminated on 5 consecutive days for 10 minutes by LED at 470 or 630 nm. Effects of light on in vitro wound healing were evaluated by analyzing time to closure, proliferation, apoptosis, and necrosis rates. RESULTS: Illumination substantially affected cell viability and cell growth. Blue light strongly decreased proliferation and augmented apoptosis in all 3 cell types and increased necrosis rates in C2C12 and NIH/3T3 cells. In contrast, red light did not alter apoptosis in either cell type but promoted proliferation in all 3 cell types with significant effects in C2C12 and NIH/3T3 cells and shortened time to closure in all 3 cell types. CONCLUSION: Light-emitting diode light illumination could be a therapeutic option and positively affect wound healing processes. By choosing appropriate wavelengths, variable effects can be achieved.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922658042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000266
DO - 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000266
M3 - Article
C2 - 25654197
AN - SCOPUS:84922658042
SN - 1076-0512
VL - 41
SP - 261
EP - 268
JO - Dermatologic Surgery
JF - Dermatologic Surgery
IS - 2
ER -