Phase retrieval without small-ball probability assumptions: Stability and uniqueness

Felix Krahmer, Yi Kai Liu

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

We study stability and uniqueness for the phase retrieval problem. That is, we ask when is a signal x ε Rn stably and uniquely determined (up to small perturbations), when one performs phaseless measurements of the form yi = aTix2 (for i = 1..., N), where the vectors ai ε Rn are chosen independently at random, with each coordinate aij ε R being chosen independently from a fixed sub-Gaussian distribution D. It is well known that for many common choices of D, certain ambiguities can arise that prevent x from being uniquely determined. In this note we show that for any sub-Gaussian distribution D, with no additional assumptions, most vectors x cannot lead to such ambiguities. More precisely, we show stability and uniqueness for all sets of vectors T ⊂ Rn which are not too peaky, in the sense that at most a constant fraction of their mass is concentrated on any one coordinate. The number of measurements needed to recover x ε T depends on the complexity of T in a natural way, extending previous results of Eldar and Mendelson [12].

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2015 International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications, SampTA 2015
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages411-414
Number of pages4
ISBN (Electronic)9781467373531
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Jul 2015
Event11th International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications, SampTA 2015 - Washington, United States
Duration: 25 May 201529 May 2015

Publication series

Name2015 International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications, SampTA 2015

Conference

Conference11th International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications, SampTA 2015
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityWashington
Period25/05/1529/05/15

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phase retrieval without small-ball probability assumptions: Stability and uniqueness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this