Abstract
This paper illustrates the relative performance of several techniques for nonlinear predictive modeling of simulated censored clinical survival data on the basis of measured risk factors: a neural net approach developed in our group, the CART technique, and the Cox model with (and without) quadratic interactions. Simulated follow-up data is first generated by combining empirical multivariate distributions of clinical factors in breast cancer patients with hypothetical nonlinear risk structures, which are thus `known'. The performance of these analysis methods is evaluated here by comparing the `known' and predicted scores on training and validation (generalization) samples containing 500 patients each. The neural net has the best performance for a complex risk structure in which three-factor interactions play an important role.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages | 309-312 |
Number of pages | 4 |
State | Published - 1999 |
Event | Proceedings of the 1999 3rd International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information Engineering Systems (KES '99) - Adelaide, Aust Duration: 31 Aug 1999 → 1 Sep 1999 |
Conference
Conference | Proceedings of the 1999 3rd International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information Engineering Systems (KES '99) |
---|---|
City | Adelaide, Aust |
Period | 31/08/99 → 1/09/99 |