Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Peak detection method evaluation for ion mobility spectrometry by using machine learning approaches

  • Anne Christin Hauschild
  • , Dominik Kopczynski
  • , Marianna D'Addario
  • , Jörg Ingo Baumbach
  • , Sven Rahmann
  • , Jan Baumbach
  • Max-Planck Institute for Informatics
  • Saarland University
  • pro3dure medical GmbH
  • BioMedizinZentrum Dortmund
  • University of Duisburg-Essen
  • University of Southern Denmark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ion mobility spectrometry with pre-separation by multi-capillary columns (MCC/IMS) has become an established inexpensive, non-invasive bioanalytics technology for detecting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with various metabolomics applications in medical research. To pave the way for this technology towards daily usage in medical practice, different steps still have to be taken. With respect to modern biomarker research, one of the most important tasks is the automatic classification of patient-specific data sets into different groups, healthy or not, for instance. Although sophisticated machine learning methods exist, an inevitable preprocessing step is reliable and robust peak detection without manual intervention. In this work we evaluate four state-of-the-art approaches for automated IMS-based peak detection: local maxima search, watershed transformation with IPHEx, region-merging with VisualNow, and peak model estimation (PME).We manually generated a gold standard with the aid of a domain expert (manual) and compare the performance of the four peak calling methods with respect to two distinct criteria. We first utilize established machine learning methods and systematically study their classification performance based on the four peak detectors' results. Second, we investigate the classification variance and robustness regarding perturbation and overfitting. Our main finding is that the power of the classification accuracy is almost equally good for all methods, the manually created gold standard as well as the four automatic peak finding methods. In addition, we note that all tools, manual and automatic, are similarly robust against perturbations. However, the classification performance is more robust against overfitting when using the PME as peak calling preprocessor. In summary, we conclude that all methods, though small differences exist, are largely reliable and enable a wide spectrum of real-world biomedical applications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277-293
Number of pages17
JournalMetabolites
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 16 Apr 2013
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Ion mobility spectrometry
  • Machine learning
  • Peak detection
  • Spectrum analysis
  • mcc/ims

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Peak detection method evaluation for ion mobility spectrometry by using machine learning approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this