Patients' and psychiatrists' perceptions of clinical decisions during schizophrenia treatment

Johannes Hamann, Rosmarie T. Mendel, Barbara Fink, Herbert Pfeiffer, Rudolf Cohen, Werner Kissling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

Shared decision making is advocated for patients with schizophrenia. However, there is limited knowledge as to which events are actually considered to be decisions by psychiatrists and patients. Semistructured interviews with regard to clinical decisions of the preceding week were performed with psychiatrists and inpatients with schizophrenia. There was good correspondence between patients and psychiatrists regarding decisional topics but poor correspondence regarding individual decisions. Medication issues were the most prominent, but other topics were also frequently cited. Not being included in decisions was associated with patients' desire to make the decisions differently. Patients treated involuntarily felt more often that they were not included in decisions and wanted to make different decisions. Thus, many patients do not feel involved in treatment decisions and are at the risk of noncompliance since they state that they would have made decisions differently from their psychiatrists. This is especially true of those being treated involuntarily.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-332
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Volume196
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Compliance
  • Doctor-patient communication
  • Patient participation
  • Schizophrenia
  • Shared decision making

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patients' and psychiatrists' perceptions of clinical decisions during schizophrenia treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this