TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient satisfaction with coronary CT angiography, myocardial CT perfusion, myocardial perfusion MRI, SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging and conventional coronary angiography
AU - Feger, S.
AU - Rief, M.
AU - Zimmermann, E.
AU - Richter, F.
AU - Roehle, R.
AU - Dewey, M.
AU - Schönenberger, E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, European Society of Radiology.
PY - 2015/7/8
Y1 - 2015/7/8
N2 - Objectives: To evaluate patient acceptance of noninvasive imaging tests for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD), including single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI), stress perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), coronary CT angiography (CTA) in combination with CT myocardial stress perfusion (CTP), and conventional coronary angiography (CCA). Methods: Intraindividual comparison of perception of 48 patients from the CORE320 multicentre multinational study who underwent rest and stress SPECT-MPI with a technetium-based tracer, combined CTA and CTP (both with contrast agent, CTP with adenosine), MRI, and CCA. The analysis was performed by using a validated questionnaire. Results: Patients had significantly more concern prior to CCA than before CTA/CTP (p < 0.001). CTA/CTP was also rated as more comfortable than SPECT-MPI (p = 0.001). Overall satisfaction with CT was superior to that of MRI (p = 0.007). More patients preferred CT (46 %; p < 0.001) as a future diagnostic test. Regarding combined CTA/CTP, CTP was characterised by higher pain levels and an increased frequency of angina pectoris during the examination (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed a higher degree of pain during SPECT-MPI with adenosine stress compared to physical exercise (p = 0.016). Conclusions: All noninvasive cardiac imaging tests are well accepted by patients, with CT being the preferred examination.
AB - Objectives: To evaluate patient acceptance of noninvasive imaging tests for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD), including single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI), stress perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), coronary CT angiography (CTA) in combination with CT myocardial stress perfusion (CTP), and conventional coronary angiography (CCA). Methods: Intraindividual comparison of perception of 48 patients from the CORE320 multicentre multinational study who underwent rest and stress SPECT-MPI with a technetium-based tracer, combined CTA and CTP (both with contrast agent, CTP with adenosine), MRI, and CCA. The analysis was performed by using a validated questionnaire. Results: Patients had significantly more concern prior to CCA than before CTA/CTP (p < 0.001). CTA/CTP was also rated as more comfortable than SPECT-MPI (p = 0.001). Overall satisfaction with CT was superior to that of MRI (p = 0.007). More patients preferred CT (46 %; p < 0.001) as a future diagnostic test. Regarding combined CTA/CTP, CTP was characterised by higher pain levels and an increased frequency of angina pectoris during the examination (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed a higher degree of pain during SPECT-MPI with adenosine stress compared to physical exercise (p = 0.016). Conclusions: All noninvasive cardiac imaging tests are well accepted by patients, with CT being the preferred examination.
KW - Coronary artery disease
KW - Multidetector computed tomography
KW - Patient satisfaction
KW - Single-photon emission computed tomography
KW - Stress perfusion magnetic resonance imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930476534&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00330-015-3604-8
DO - 10.1007/s00330-015-3604-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 25764088
AN - SCOPUS:84930476534
SN - 0938-7994
VL - 25
SP - 2115
EP - 2124
JO - European Radiology
JF - European Radiology
IS - 7
ER -