Patient satisfaction, joint stability and return to sports following simple elbow dislocations: surgical versus non-surgical treatment

Stephanie Geyer, Lucca Lacheta, Jesse Seilern und Aspang, Lukas Willinger, Patricia M. Lutz, Sebastian Lappen, Andreas B. Imhoff, Sebastian Siebenlist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: While conservative management is commonly promoted for simple elbow dislocations, the importance of primary surgical treatment in these injuries is still undetermined. The objective of this study was to report patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to sports (RTS) and joint stability using ultrasound in patients following conservative or surgical treatment after simple elbow dislocation. Methods: Patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months after conservative (CT) or surgical treatment (ST) following simple elbow dislocation were included in this retrospective study. To evaluate patients’ postoperative outcome and satisfaction, the Elbow Self-Assessment Score (ESAS) was used, and validated scores such as the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), the Quick Disability of Arm and Shoulder Score (Quick-DASH) and RTS were assessed. For objective assessment of residual joint instability, a standardized clinical examination as well as a dynamic ultrasound evaluation of the affected and the contralateral elbow was performed. Results: Forty-four patients (26 women, 18 men) with an average age of 41.5 ± 15.3 years were available for follow-up survey (65.5 ± 30.4 months; range 26–123). 21 patients were treated conservatively and twenty-three patients received surgical treatment. CT and ST resulted in similar outcome with regard to ROM, ESAS (CT: 99.4 ± 1.5; ST: 99.8 ± 0.3), MEPS (CT: 97.3 ± 6.8 points; ST: 98.7 ± 3.3) and Quick-DASH (CT: 7.8 ± 10.4; ST: 6.3 ± 7.9) (n.s.). There was no difference in elbow stability and laxity measured by ultrasound between the study groups and compared to the healthy elbow (n.s.). Two patients of the CT group (10%) complained about persistent subjective elbow instability. RTS was faster after surgical compared to conservative treatment (p = 0.036). Conclusion: Both, conservative and surgical treatment results in high patient satisfaction and good-to-excellent functional outcome after simple elbow dislocation. Even though ultrasound evaluation showed no significant differences in joint gapping between groups, 10% of conservatively treated patients complained about severe subjective instability. Surgically treated patients returned faster to their preoperatively performed sports. Thus, primary surgical treatment may be beneficial for high demanding patients. Level of evidence: Therapeutic study, Level III.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1481-1489
Number of pages9
JournalArchives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Volume143
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023

Keywords

  • Elbow
  • Instability
  • Return to sports
  • Simple elbow dislocation
  • Ultrasound

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient satisfaction, joint stability and return to sports following simple elbow dislocations: surgical versus non-surgical treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this