TY - JOUR
T1 - Pathology as the cornerstone of human tissue banking
T2 - European consensus expert group report
AU - Hainaut, Pierre
AU - Caboux, Elodie
AU - Bevilacqua, Generoso
AU - Bosman, Fref
AU - Dassesse, Thibaut
AU - Hoefler, Heinz
AU - Janin, Anne
AU - Langer, Rupert
AU - Larsimont, Denis
AU - Morente, Manuel
AU - Riegman, Peter
AU - Schirmacher, Peter
AU - Stanta, Giorgio
AU - Zatloukal, Kurt
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Aside from ethical considerations, the primary requirement for usage of human tissues in basic or translational research is the thorough characterization of tissues. The second, but equally essential, requirement is that tissues be collected, processed, annotated, and preserved in optimal conditions. These requirements put the pathologist at the center of tissue banking activities and of research aimed at discovering new biomarkers. Pathologists not only provide information identifying the specimen but also make decisions on what materials should be biobanked, on the preservation conditions, and on the timeline of events that precede preservation and storage. This central position calls for increased recognition of the role of the pathologist by the biomolecular community and places new demands on the pathologist's workload and scope of scientific activities. These questions were addressed by an Expert Group Meeting of the European Biological and Biomolecular Research Infrastructure (BBMRI). While detailed recommendations are published elsewhere (Bevilacqua et al., Virchows Archivs , 2010, in press), this article outlines the strategic and technological issues identified by the Expert Group and identifies ways forward for better integration of pathology in the current thrust for development of biomarker-based "personalized medicine."
AB - Aside from ethical considerations, the primary requirement for usage of human tissues in basic or translational research is the thorough characterization of tissues. The second, but equally essential, requirement is that tissues be collected, processed, annotated, and preserved in optimal conditions. These requirements put the pathologist at the center of tissue banking activities and of research aimed at discovering new biomarkers. Pathologists not only provide information identifying the specimen but also make decisions on what materials should be biobanked, on the preservation conditions, and on the timeline of events that precede preservation and storage. This central position calls for increased recognition of the role of the pathologist by the biomolecular community and places new demands on the pathologist's workload and scope of scientific activities. These questions were addressed by an Expert Group Meeting of the European Biological and Biomolecular Research Infrastructure (BBMRI). While detailed recommendations are published elsewhere (Bevilacqua et al., Virchows Archivs , 2010, in press), this article outlines the strategic and technological issues identified by the Expert Group and identifies ways forward for better integration of pathology in the current thrust for development of biomarker-based "personalized medicine."
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955901736&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/bio.2010.7303
DO - 10.1089/bio.2010.7303
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77955901736
SN - 1947-5535
VL - 7
SP - 157
EP - 160
JO - Biopreservation and Biobanking
JF - Biopreservation and Biobanking
IS - 3
ER -