TY - JOUR
T1 - Patent litigation in Europe
AU - Cremers, Katrin
AU - Ernicke, Max
AU - Gaessler, Fabian
AU - Harhoff, Dietmar
AU - Helmers, Christian
AU - McDonagh, Luke
AU - Schliessler, Paula
AU - van Zeebroeck, Nicolas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2016.
PY - 2017/8
Y1 - 2017/8
N2 - We compare patent litigation cases across four European jurisdictions— Germany, the UK (England and Wales), France, The Netherlands—using case-level data gathered from cases filed in the four jurisdictions during the period 2000–2008. Overall, we find substantial differences across jurisdictions in terms of caseloads— notably, courts in Germany hear by far the largest number of cases, not only in absolute terms, but also when taking macro-economic indicators into account—and we further find important cross-country variances in terms of case outcomes. Moreover, we show empirically that a considerable number of patents are litigated across multiple European jurisdictions; and further, that in the majority of these cases divergent case outcomes are reached across the different jurisdictions, suggesting that the long-suspected problem of inconsistency of decision-making in European patent litigation is in fact real. Finally, we note that the coming into force of the Unified Patent Court in Europe may, in the long term, help to alleviate this inconsistency problem.
AB - We compare patent litigation cases across four European jurisdictions— Germany, the UK (England and Wales), France, The Netherlands—using case-level data gathered from cases filed in the four jurisdictions during the period 2000–2008. Overall, we find substantial differences across jurisdictions in terms of caseloads— notably, courts in Germany hear by far the largest number of cases, not only in absolute terms, but also when taking macro-economic indicators into account—and we further find important cross-country variances in terms of case outcomes. Moreover, we show empirically that a considerable number of patents are litigated across multiple European jurisdictions; and further, that in the majority of these cases divergent case outcomes are reached across the different jurisdictions, suggesting that the long-suspected problem of inconsistency of decision-making in European patent litigation is in fact real. Finally, we note that the coming into force of the Unified Patent Court in Europe may, in the long term, help to alleviate this inconsistency problem.
KW - Enforcement
KW - Europe
KW - Patent litigation
KW - Patent system
KW - Unified patent court
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071989374&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10657-016-9529-0
DO - 10.1007/s10657-016-9529-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85071989374
SN - 0929-1261
VL - 44
SP - 1
EP - 44
JO - European Journal of Law and Economics
JF - European Journal of Law and Economics
IS - 1
ER -