Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Paclitaxel/Ramucirumab versus Paclitaxel in 2nd-Line Therapy of Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Randomized Phase II IKF-AIO-RAMOS Trial

  • Magdalena K. Scheck
  • , Thorsten O. Goetze
  • , Thomas J. Ettrich
  • , Harald Schmalenberg
  • , Michael Clemens
  • , Rolf Mahlberg
  • , Steffen Heeg
  • , Stephan Kanzler
  • , Gunnar Hapke
  • , Peter Thuss-Patience
  • , Angelika Kestler
  • , Anne Treschl
  • , Stefan Heidel
  • , Moritz Schiemer
  • , Disorn Sookthai
  • , Sabine Junge
  • , Claudia Pauligk
  • , Salah Eddin Al-Batran
  • , Sylvie Lorenzen
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt am Main
  • University Medical Center Ulm and Center of Excellence 'Metabolic Disorders'
  • Medizinische Klinik I
  • Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie
  • Klinikum Mutterhaus Trier
  • University of Freiburg
  • Leopoldina-Krankenhaus
  • Zentrum für Innere Medizin
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • Robert-Bosch-Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: In squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (ESCC), therapeutical options in 2nd-line treatment are scarce with immune checkpoint inhibition being the only approved one. Ramucirumab/paclitaxel is an approved 2ndline treatment in metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. We assessed safety and efficacy of ramucirumab/ paclitaxel for ESCC. Methods: This prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial evaluated paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15) plus ramucirumab (8 mg/kg days 1, 15) (investigational arm A) versus paclitaxel alone (80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15) (standard arm B), both q4w, in advanced/ metastatic ESCC refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based drugs. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) rate at 6 months. Results: From 3/2019 to 4/ 2021, 21/186 planned patients were included (arm A 11 patients; arm B 10 patients) in 9 German centers. Due to slow accrual, the study was terminated prematurely. OS at 6 months was 72.7% for ramucirumab/paclitaxel and 50.0% for paclitaxel. The study design did not allow statistical comparison of the arms. PFS (3.8 vs. 3.5 months), OS (12.1 vs. 9.2 months), ORR (18.2% vs. 20.0%) and DCR (54.5% vs. 60.0%) were comparable in both arms. Most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in arm A were leucopenia (54.5%), fatigue (27.3%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (18.2%). 27.3% in arm A and 50.0% in arm B had TRAEs ≥ grade 3. Conclusion: Ramucirumab/paclitaxel shows an acceptable tolerability and numerically improved OS at 6 months. Due to the small number of patients, the current trial must be considered exploratory and more data are needed in this indication.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)549-560
Number of pages12
JournalOncology Research and Treatment
Volume47
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Advanced esophagus squamous cancer
  • Antiangiogenic
  • Paclitaxel
  • Ramucirumab
  • Second-line

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Paclitaxel/Ramucirumab versus Paclitaxel in 2nd-Line Therapy of Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Randomized Phase II IKF-AIO-RAMOS Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this