Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Overview of the JET results

  • JET contributors
  • JET Joint Undertaking
  • Institute for Plasma Research
  • Instituto Superior Técnico
  • Institute of Plasma Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences
  • Culham Centre for Fusion Energy
  • Queen's University Belfast
  • VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
  • Helsinki University of Technology
  • University of Tartu
  • Università di Napoli Federico II
  • Laboratorio Nacional de Fusion, CIEMAT
  • Istituto di Fisica del Plasma Piero Caldirola
  • ITER
  • Consorzio Rfx
  • National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
  • Universita La Sapienza
  • Università di Napoli Parthenope
  • Troitsk Insitute of Innovating and Thermonuclear Research (TRINITI)
  • Chalmers University of Technology
  • Uppsala University
  • C.R.ENEA
  • National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics
  • National Institute for Cryogenics and Isotopic Technology
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics
  • Università di Catania
  • IRFM, CEA
  • Fusion for Energy
  • University of Latvia
  • EUROfusion Programme Management Unit
  • Nuclear Fuel Plant
  • Humanoid Technologies Lab (H2T)
  • University of York
  • Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion
  • Culham Science Centre
  • Center for Autonomous Systems
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  • University of Helsinki
  • EPFL
  • Wigner Research Centre for Physics
  • Comenius University
  • LPP-ERM/KMS
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (FZJ)
  • Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis
  • The National Institute for Optoelectronics
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • SCK-CEN
  • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • University of Cagliari
  • University of Warwick
  • FOM
  • Ghent University
  • University College Cork
  • Consorzio CREATE
  • UNED
  • Institute of Electronics Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
  • European Commission
  • University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”
  • Università della Basilicata
  • Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas
  • Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • University of Seville
  • Universit̀ Degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
  • The Russian Academy of Sciences
  • General Atomics
  • University of Innsbruck
  • Technical University of Denmark
  • Japan Atomic Energy Agency
  • University of Oxford
  • Lund University
  • Seoul National University
  • Technical University of Vienna
  • Daegu University
  • National Technical University of Athens
  • National Fusion Research Institute(NFRI)
  • Dublin City University
  • Jožef Stefan Institute
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Polytechnic University of Madrid
  • Gzhatskaya Ulitsa
  • BCS
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  • University of Basel
  • Carlos III University
  • CNRS
  • University of California
  • Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering
  • University of Strathclyde
  • Politecnico di Torino
  • University of São Paulo
  • NCSR Demokritos
  • Lithuanian Energy Institute
  • Tampere University
  • Università di Cassino
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

103 Scopus citations

Abstract

Since the installation of an ITER-like wall, the JET programme has focused on the consolidation of ITER design choices and the preparation for ITER operation, with a specific emphasis given to the bulk tungsten melt experiment, which has been crucial for the final decision on the material choice for the day-one tungsten divertor in ITER. Integrated scenarios have been progressed with the re-establishment of long-pulse, high-confinement H-modes by optimizing the magnetic configuration and the use of ICRH to avoid tungsten impurity accumulation. Stationary discharges with detached divertor conditions and small edge localized modes have been demonstrated by nitrogen seeding. The differences in confinement and pedestal behaviour before and after the ITER-like wall installation have been better characterized towards the development of high fusion yield scenarios in DT. Post-mortem analyses of the plasma-facing components have confirmed the previously reported low fuel retention obtained by gas balance and shown that the pattern of deposition within the divertor has changed significantly with respect to the JET carbon wall campaigns due to the absence of thermally activated chemical erosion of beryllium in contrast to carbon. Transport to remote areas is almost absent and two orders of magnitude less material is found in the divertor.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104001
JournalNuclear Fusion
Volume55
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 27 Mar 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Overview of the JET results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this