Order Ethics: Bridging the Gap Between Contractarianism and Business Ethics

Christoph Luetge, Thomas Armbrüster, Julian Müller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

Contract-based approaches have been a focus of attention in business ethics. As one of the grand traditions in political philosophy, contractarianism is founded on the notion that we will never resolve deep moral disagreement. Classical philosophers like Hobbes and Locke, or recent ones like Rawls and Gaus, seek to solve ethical conflicts on the level of social rules and procedures. Recent authors in business ethics have sought to utilize contract-based approaches for their field and to apply it to concrete business dilemmas. However, the application of contractarianism to management contexts can cause difficulties. Our article discusses this conceptual problem of contractarian business ethics and presents the idea of order ethics as an alternative. Order ethics, as we argue, can make a difference by conceptually bridging the gap between contractarianism and business ethics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)687-697
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume136
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2016

Keywords

  • Business ethics
  • Constitutional economics
  • Contractarian business ethics (CBE)
  • Contractualism
  • Liberalism
  • Political philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Order Ethics: Bridging the Gap Between Contractarianism and Business Ethics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this