On the Value of Job Migration in Online Makespan Minimization

Susanne Albers, Matthias Hellwig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


Makespan minimization on identical parallel machines is a classical scheduling problem. We consider the online scenario where a sequence of n jobs has to be scheduled non-preemptively on m machines so as to minimize the maximum completion time of any job. The best competitive ratio that can be achieved by deterministic online algorithms is in the range [1.88, 1.9201]. Currently no randomized online algorithm with a smaller competitiveness is known, for general m. In this paper we explore the power of job migration, i.e. an online scheduler is allowed to perform a limited number of job reassignments. Migration is a common technique used in theory and practice to balance load in parallel processing environments. As our main result we settle the performance that can be achieved by deterministic online algorithms. We develop an algorithm that is αm-competitive, for any m≥ 2 , where αm is the solution of a certain equation. For m= 2 , α2= 4 / 3 and lim mαm= W- 1(- 1 / e2) / (1 + W- 1(- 1 / e2)) ≈ 1.4659. Here W- 1 is the lower branch of the Lambert W function. For m≥ 11 , the algorithm uses at most 7m migration operations. For smaller m, 8m to 10m operations may be performed. We complement this result by a matching lower bound: No online algorithm that uses o(n) job migrations can achieve a competitive ratio smaller than αm. We finally trade performance for migrations. We give a family of algorithms that is c-competitive, for any 5 / 3 ≤ c≤ 2. For c= 5 / 3 , the strategy uses at most 4m job migrations. For c= 1.75 , at most 2.5m migrations are used.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)598-623
Number of pages26
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2017


  • Competitive analysis
  • Job migration
  • Makespan minimization
  • Online algorithm
  • Scheduling


Dive into the research topics of 'On the Value of Job Migration in Online Makespan Minimization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this