TY - GEN
T1 - On the quantification of robustness of structures
AU - Faber, Michael H.
AU - Maes, Marc A.
AU - Straub, Daniel
AU - Baker, Jack
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - The paper first reviews different interpretations of robustness. On this basis objectives facilitating the quantification of robustness of engineering systems are formulated. Thereafter a generic framework for risk assessments of engineering systems is presented in which robustness is related to the ability of the system to sustain damages. This framework is then applied to quantify robustness of structural systems and to develop a robustness index facilitating a consistent ranking of structures according to their robustness. The proposed approach to the assessment of robustness principally takes into account the effect of redundancy, ductility, damage and failure consequences as well as strategies for condition control and intervention during the service life of structures. Finally, a simple example illustrates the use of the framework for the assessment of the robustness of a jacket steel structure subject to fatigue damage. The example shows that presently used indicators for the robustness of jacket type steel structures such as the RIF only capture part of the picture and illustrates the merits of a risk based framework for robustness assessments.
AB - The paper first reviews different interpretations of robustness. On this basis objectives facilitating the quantification of robustness of engineering systems are formulated. Thereafter a generic framework for risk assessments of engineering systems is presented in which robustness is related to the ability of the system to sustain damages. This framework is then applied to quantify robustness of structural systems and to develop a robustness index facilitating a consistent ranking of structures according to their robustness. The proposed approach to the assessment of robustness principally takes into account the effect of redundancy, ductility, damage and failure consequences as well as strategies for condition control and intervention during the service life of structures. Finally, a simple example illustrates the use of the framework for the assessment of the robustness of a jacket steel structure subject to fatigue damage. The example shows that presently used indicators for the robustness of jacket type steel structures such as the RIF only capture part of the picture and illustrates the merits of a risk based framework for robustness assessments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751324757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/OMAE2006-92095
DO - 10.1115/OMAE2006-92095
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:33751324757
SN - 0791837777
SN - 9780791837771
T3 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE
BT - Proceedings of 25TH International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2006
T2 - 25TH International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2006
Y2 - 4 June 2006 through 9 June 2006
ER -