TY - JOUR
T1 - On the functional relationship between biodiversity and economic value
AU - Paul, Carola
AU - Hanley, Nick
AU - Meyer, Sebastian T.
AU - Fürst, Christine
AU - Weisser, Wolfgang W.
AU - Knoke, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved.
PY - 2020/1/29
Y1 - 2020/1/29
N2 - Biodiversity's contribution to human welfare has become a key argument for maintaining and enhancing biodiversity in managed ecosystems. The functional relationship between biodiversity (b) and economic value (V) is, however, insufficiently understood, despite the premise of a positive-concave bV relationship that dominates scientific and political arenas. Here, we review how individual links between biodiversity, ecosystem functions (F), and services affect resulting bV relationships. Our findings show that bV relationships are more variable, also taking negative-concave/convex or strictly concave and convex forms. This functional form is driven not only by the underlying bF relationship but also by the number and type of ecosystem services and their potential tradeoffs considered, the effects of inputs, and the type of utility function used to represent human preferences. Explicitly accounting for these aspects will enhance the substance and coverage of future valuation studies and allow more nuanced conclusions, particularly for managed ecosystems.
AB - Biodiversity's contribution to human welfare has become a key argument for maintaining and enhancing biodiversity in managed ecosystems. The functional relationship between biodiversity (b) and economic value (V) is, however, insufficiently understood, despite the premise of a positive-concave bV relationship that dominates scientific and political arenas. Here, we review how individual links between biodiversity, ecosystem functions (F), and services affect resulting bV relationships. Our findings show that bV relationships are more variable, also taking negative-concave/convex or strictly concave and convex forms. This functional form is driven not only by the underlying bF relationship but also by the number and type of ecosystem services and their potential tradeoffs considered, the effects of inputs, and the type of utility function used to represent human preferences. Explicitly accounting for these aspects will enhance the substance and coverage of future valuation studies and allow more nuanced conclusions, particularly for managed ecosystems.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078968767&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1126/sciadv.aax7712
DO - 10.1126/sciadv.aax7712
M3 - Article
C2 - 32064338
AN - SCOPUS:85078968767
SN - 2375-2548
VL - 6
JO - Science Advances
JF - Science Advances
IS - 5
M1 - eaax7712
ER -