TY - GEN
T1 - On optimal neighbor discovery
AU - Kindt, Philipp H.
AU - Chakraborty, Samarjit
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Association for Computing Machinery.
PY - 2019/8/19
Y1 - 2019/8/19
N2 - Mobile devices apply neighbor discovery (ND) protocols to wirelessly initiate a first contact within the shortest possible amount of time and with minimal energy consumption. For this purpose, over the last decade, a vast number of ND protocols have been proposed, which have progressively reduced the relation between the time within which discovery is guaranteed and the energy consumption. In spite of the simplicity of the problem statement, even after more than 10 years of research on this specific topic, new solutions are still proposed even today. Despite the large number of known ND protocols, given an energy budget, what is the best achievable latency still remains unclear. This paper addresses this question and for the first time presents safe and tight, duty-cycle-dependent bounds on the worst-case discovery latency that no ND protocol can beat. Surprisingly, several existing protocols are indeed optimal, which has not been known until now. We conclude that there is no further potential to improve the relation between latency and duty-cycle, but future ND protocols can improve their robustness against beacon collisions.
AB - Mobile devices apply neighbor discovery (ND) protocols to wirelessly initiate a first contact within the shortest possible amount of time and with minimal energy consumption. For this purpose, over the last decade, a vast number of ND protocols have been proposed, which have progressively reduced the relation between the time within which discovery is guaranteed and the energy consumption. In spite of the simplicity of the problem statement, even after more than 10 years of research on this specific topic, new solutions are still proposed even today. Despite the large number of known ND protocols, given an energy budget, what is the best achievable latency still remains unclear. This paper addresses this question and for the first time presents safe and tight, duty-cycle-dependent bounds on the worst-case discovery latency that no ND protocol can beat. Surprisingly, several existing protocols are indeed optimal, which has not been known until now. We conclude that there is no further potential to improve the relation between latency and duty-cycle, but future ND protocols can improve their robustness against beacon collisions.
KW - MANETs
KW - Neighbor Discovery
KW - Sensor Networks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072285678&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3341302.3342067
DO - 10.1145/3341302.3342067
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85072285678
T3 - SIGCOMM 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
SP - 441
EP - 457
BT - SIGCOMM 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
PB - Association for Computing Machinery, Inc
T2 - 50th Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, SIGCOMM 2019
Y2 - 19 August 2019 through 23 August 2019
ER -