Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Numerical comparison of x-ray differential phase contrast and attenuation contrast

  • Dieter Hahn
  • , Pierre Thibault
  • , Martin Bech
  • , Marco Stockmar
  • , Simone Schleede
  • , Irene Zanette
  • , Alexander Rack
  • , Timm Weitkamp
  • , Aniko Sztrókay
  • , Thomas Schlossbauer
  • , Fabian Bamberg
  • , Maximilian Reiser
  • , Franz Pfeiffer
  • Technical University of Munich
  • European Synchrotron Radiation Facility
  • L'Orme des Merisiers
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

We present a numerical tool to compare directly the contrastto-noise-ratio (CNR) of the attenuation- and differential phase-contrast signals available from grating-based X-ray imaging for single radiographs. The attenuation projection is differentiated to bring it into a modality comparable to the differential phase projection using a Gaussian derivative filter. A Relative Contrast Gain (RCG) is then defined as the ratio of the CNR of image values in a region of interest (ROI) in the differential phase projection to the CNR of image values in the same ROI in the differential attenuation projection. We apply the method on experimental data of human breast tissue acquired using a grating interferometer to compare the two contrast modes for two regions of interest differing in the type of tissue. Our results indicate that the proposed method can be used as a local estimate of the spatial distribution of the ratio δ/β, i.e., real and imaginary part of the complex refractive index, across a sample.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1141-1148
Number of pages8
JournalBiomedical Optics Express
Volume3
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Numerical comparison of x-ray differential phase contrast and attenuation contrast'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this