TY - JOUR
T1 - Non-structural flood management in european rural mountain Areas—are scientists supporting implementation?
AU - Conitz, Felix
AU - Zingraff-Hamed, Aude
AU - Lupp, Gerd
AU - Pauleit, Stephan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Mountain areas are highly exposed to flood risks. The latter are increasing in the context of climate change, urbanization, and land use changes. Non-structural approaches such as nature-based solutions can provide opportunities to reduce the risks of such natural hazards and provide further ecological, social, and economic benefits. However, few non-structural flood mitigation measures are implemented in rural mountain areas so far. The objective of this paper is to investigate if the scientific boundaries limit the implementation of non-structural flood management in rural mountain areas. In the study, we statistically analyzed the knowledge about flood management through a systematic literature review and expert surveys, with a focus on European rural mountain areas. Both methods showed that scientific knowledge is available for decision makers and that nature-based solutions are efficient, cost-effective, multifunctional, and have potential for large-scale implementation.
AB - Mountain areas are highly exposed to flood risks. The latter are increasing in the context of climate change, urbanization, and land use changes. Non-structural approaches such as nature-based solutions can provide opportunities to reduce the risks of such natural hazards and provide further ecological, social, and economic benefits. However, few non-structural flood mitigation measures are implemented in rural mountain areas so far. The objective of this paper is to investigate if the scientific boundaries limit the implementation of non-structural flood management in rural mountain areas. In the study, we statistically analyzed the knowledge about flood management through a systematic literature review and expert surveys, with a focus on European rural mountain areas. Both methods showed that scientific knowledge is available for decision makers and that nature-based solutions are efficient, cost-effective, multifunctional, and have potential for large-scale implementation.
KW - Engineered
KW - Land management
KW - Land use
KW - Multiple correspondence analysis
KW - Planning
KW - Resilience
KW - Risk management cycle
KW - Socio-ecological system
KW - Socio-hydrology
KW - Technical
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120306329&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/hydrology8040167
DO - 10.3390/hydrology8040167
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85120306329
SN - 2306-5338
VL - 8
JO - Hydrology
JF - Hydrology
IS - 4
M1 - 167
ER -