Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

No Remdesivir Resistance Observed in the Phase 3 Severe and Moderate COVID-19 SIMPLE Trials

  • Charlotte Hedskog
  • , Christoph D. Spinner
  • , Ulrike Protzer
  • , Dieter Hoffmann
  • , Chunkyu Ko
  • , Robert L. Gottlieb
  • , Medhat Askar
  • , Meta Roestenberg
  • , Jutte J.C. de Vries
  • , Ellen C. Carbo
  • , Ross Martin
  • , Jiani Li
  • , Dong Han
  • , Lauren Rodriguez
  • , Aiyappa Parvangada
  • , Jason K. Perry
  • , Ricard Ferrer
  • , Andrés Antón
  • , Cristina Andrés
  • , Vanessa Casares
  • Huldrych F. Günthard, Michael Huber, Grace A. McComsey, Navid Sadri, Judith A. Aberg, Harm van Bakel, Danielle P. Porter
  • Gilead Sciences Incorporated
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
  • Munich Partner Site
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Institute of Virology
  • Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology
  • Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas
  • Scott and White
  • Texas A&M University
  • Burnett School of Medicine
  • Qatar University College of Medicine
  • University of Leiden
  • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
  • University Hospital Zurich
  • University of Zurich
  • Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine
  • Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Remdesivir (RDV) is a broad-spectrum nucleotide analog prodrug approved for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients with clinical benefit demonstrated in multiple Phase 3 trials. Here we present SARS-CoV-2 resistance analyses from the Phase 3 SIMPLE clinical studies evaluating RDV in hospitalized participants with severe or moderate COVID-19 disease. The severe and moderate studies enrolled participants with radiologic evidence of pneumonia and a room-air oxygen saturation of ≤94% or >94%, respectively. Virology sample collection was optional in the study protocols. Sequencing and related viral load data were obtained retrospectively from participants at a subset of study sites with local sequencing capabilities (10 of 183 sites) at timepoints with detectable viral load. Among participants with both baseline and post-baseline sequencing data treated with RDV, emergent Nsp12 substitutions were observed in 4 of 19 (21%) participants in the severe study and none of the 2 participants in the moderate study. The following 5 substitutions emerged: T76I, A526V, A554V, E665K, and C697F. The substitutions T76I, A526V, A554V, and C697F had an EC50 fold change of ≤1.5 relative to the wildtype reference using a SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic replicon system, indicating no significant change in the susceptibility to RDV. The phenotyping of E665K could not be determined due to a lack of replication. These data reveal no evidence of relevant resistance emergence and further confirm the established efficacy profile of RDV with a high resistance barrier in COVID-19 patients.

Original languageEnglish
Article number546
JournalViruses
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Nsp12
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • genotyping
  • phenotyping
  • remdesivir
  • resistance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'No Remdesivir Resistance Observed in the Phase 3 Severe and Moderate COVID-19 SIMPLE Trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this