Abstract
For treatment of patients with high-risk acute coronary syndromes, current guidelines recommend early coronary angiography and coronary revascularization, when feasible, irrespective of the primary success of medical treatment. Moreover, the results of a randomized trial (ISAR-COOL) suggested performing revascularization as early as possible. The concept of systematic coronary angiography and revascularization in high-risk acute coronary syndromes has been challenged recently by another randomized study (ICTUS) demonstrating an excess of myocardial infarction during 1-year follow-up with a routine-invasive strategy when compared with a selectively invasive strategy. This review intends to put the new trial results in perspective with evidence from previous studies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | A4-A10 |
| Journal | European Heart Journal, Supplement |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | A |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2007 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Acute coronary syndromes
- Guidelines
- Meta-analysis
- Percutaneous catheter intervention
- Timing
- Treatment strategies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'New aspects in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes without ST-elevation: ICTUS and ISAR-COOL in perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver