TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiphysics Footprint of Li Plating for Li-Ion Battery and Challenges for High-Accuracy Detection
AU - Li, Zhe
AU - Fang, Ruqing
AU - Ge, Hao
AU - Liu, Zhongxiao
AU - Spingler, Franz B.
AU - Jossen, Andreas
AU - Zhang, Jianbo
AU - Liaw, Boryann
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Electrochemical Society ("ECS"). Published on behalf of ECS by IOP Publishing Limited.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Lithium plating on the negative electrode of Li-ion batteries remains as a great concern for durability, reliability and safety in operation under low temperatures and fast charging conditions. High-accuracy detection of Li-plating is critically needed for field operations. To detect the lithium plating is to track its multiphysics footprint since lithium plating often is a localized event while the driving force from chemical, electrical, thermal and mechanical origins could vary with time and locality which makes the detection and characterization challenging. Here, we summarize the multiphysical footprints of lithium plating and the corresponding state-of-the-art detection methods. By assessing and comparing these methods, the combination of capacity/voltage differential, R-Q mapping and Arrhenius outlier tracking could be promising and effective for battery diagnosis, prognosis and management. We analyze the origins of quantitative error in sample preparation, overly simplified assumption and dynamic evolution of the plated Li, and recommend the in situ and quantitative chemical analysis method, such as in situ NMR, EPR, X-ray and neutron. In addition, we propose the four conjectures on the capacity plunge, lithium plating, pore clogging, electrolyte drainage and rapid SEI growth, can be aligned and unified to one scenario basically triggered by lithium plating.
AB - Lithium plating on the negative electrode of Li-ion batteries remains as a great concern for durability, reliability and safety in operation under low temperatures and fast charging conditions. High-accuracy detection of Li-plating is critically needed for field operations. To detect the lithium plating is to track its multiphysics footprint since lithium plating often is a localized event while the driving force from chemical, electrical, thermal and mechanical origins could vary with time and locality which makes the detection and characterization challenging. Here, we summarize the multiphysical footprints of lithium plating and the corresponding state-of-the-art detection methods. By assessing and comparing these methods, the combination of capacity/voltage differential, R-Q mapping and Arrhenius outlier tracking could be promising and effective for battery diagnosis, prognosis and management. We analyze the origins of quantitative error in sample preparation, overly simplified assumption and dynamic evolution of the plated Li, and recommend the in situ and quantitative chemical analysis method, such as in situ NMR, EPR, X-ray and neutron. In addition, we propose the four conjectures on the capacity plunge, lithium plating, pore clogging, electrolyte drainage and rapid SEI growth, can be aligned and unified to one scenario basically triggered by lithium plating.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137723748&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1149/1945-7111/ac8ad2
DO - 10.1149/1945-7111/ac8ad2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85137723748
SN - 0013-4651
VL - 169
JO - Journal of the Electrochemical Society
JF - Journal of the Electrochemical Society
IS - 8
M1 - 080530
ER -