TY - JOUR
T1 - Multicentre multi-device hybrid imaging study of coronary artery disease
T2 - Results from the EValuation of INtegrated Cardiac Imaging for the Detection and Characterization of Ischaemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) hybrid imaging population
AU - Liga, Riccardo
AU - Vontobel, Jan
AU - Rovai, Daniele
AU - Marinelli, Martina
AU - Caselli, Chiara
AU - Pietila, Mikko
AU - Teresinska, Anna
AU - Aguadé-Bruix, Santiago
AU - Pizzi, Maria Nazarena
AU - Todiere, Giancarlo
AU - Gimelli, Alessia
AU - Chiappino, Dante
AU - Marraccini, Paolo
AU - Schroeder, Stephen
AU - Drosch, Tanja
AU - Poddighe, Rosa
AU - Casolo, Giancarlo
AU - Anagnostopoulos, Constantinos
AU - Pugliese, Francesca
AU - Rouzet, Francois
AU - Le Guludec, Dominique
AU - Cappelli, Francesco
AU - Valente, Serafina
AU - Gensini, Gian Franco
AU - Zawaideh, Camilla
AU - Capitanio, Selene
AU - Sambuceti, Gianmario
AU - Marsico, Fabio
AU - Filardi, Pasquale Perrone
AU - Fernández-Golfn, Covadonga
AU - Rincón, Luis M.
AU - Graner, Frank P.
AU - De Graaf, Michiel A.
AU - Stehli, Julia
AU - Reyes, Eliana
AU - Nkomo, Sandy
AU - Mäki, Maija
AU - Lorenzoni, Valentina
AU - Turchetti, Giuseppe
AU - Carpeggiani, Clara
AU - Puzzuoli, Stefano
AU - Mangione, Maurizio
AU - Marcheschi, Paolo
AU - Giannessi, Daniela
AU - Nekolla, Stephan
AU - Lombardi, Massimo
AU - Sicari, Rosa
AU - Scholte, Arthur J.H.A.
AU - Zamorano, Jose L.
AU - Underwood, S. Richard
AU - Knuuti, Juhani
AU - Kaufmann, Philipp A.
AU - Neglia, Danilo
AU - Gaemperli, Oliver
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2015.
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - Aims Hybrid imaging provides a non-invasive assessment of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion. We sought to evaluate the added clinical value of hybrid imaging in a multi-centre multi-vendor setting. Methods and results Fourteen centres enrolled 252 patients with stable angina and intermediate (20-90%) pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), CT coronary angiography (CTCA), and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR). Hybrid MPS/CTCA images were obtained by 3D image fusion. Blinded core-lab analyses were performed for CTCA, MPS, QCA and hybrid datasets. Hemodynamically significant CAD was ruled-in non-invasively in the presence of a matched finding (myocardial perfusion defect colocalized with stenosed coronary artery) and ruled-out with normal findings (both CTCA and MPS normal). Overall prevalence of significant CAD on QCA (.70% stenosis or 30-70% with FFR0.80) was 37%. Of 1004 pathological myocardial segments on MPS, 246 (25%) were reclassified from their standard coronary distribution to another territory by hybrid imaging. In this respect, in 45/252 (18%) patients, hybrid imaging reassigned an entire perfusion defect to another coronary territory, changing the final diagnosis in 42% of the cases. Hybrid imaging allowed non-invasive CAD rule-out in 41%, and rule-in in 24% of patients, with a negative and positive predictive value of 88% and 87%, respectively. Conclusion In patients at intermediate risk of CAD, hybrid imaging allows non-invasive co-localization of myocardial perfusion defects and subtending coronary arteries, impacting clinical decision-making in almost one every five subjects.
AB - Aims Hybrid imaging provides a non-invasive assessment of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion. We sought to evaluate the added clinical value of hybrid imaging in a multi-centre multi-vendor setting. Methods and results Fourteen centres enrolled 252 patients with stable angina and intermediate (20-90%) pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), CT coronary angiography (CTCA), and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR). Hybrid MPS/CTCA images were obtained by 3D image fusion. Blinded core-lab analyses were performed for CTCA, MPS, QCA and hybrid datasets. Hemodynamically significant CAD was ruled-in non-invasively in the presence of a matched finding (myocardial perfusion defect colocalized with stenosed coronary artery) and ruled-out with normal findings (both CTCA and MPS normal). Overall prevalence of significant CAD on QCA (.70% stenosis or 30-70% with FFR0.80) was 37%. Of 1004 pathological myocardial segments on MPS, 246 (25%) were reclassified from their standard coronary distribution to another territory by hybrid imaging. In this respect, in 45/252 (18%) patients, hybrid imaging reassigned an entire perfusion defect to another coronary territory, changing the final diagnosis in 42% of the cases. Hybrid imaging allowed non-invasive CAD rule-out in 41%, and rule-in in 24% of patients, with a negative and positive predictive value of 88% and 87%, respectively. Conclusion In patients at intermediate risk of CAD, hybrid imaging allows non-invasive co-localization of myocardial perfusion defects and subtending coronary arteries, impacting clinical decision-making in almost one every five subjects.
KW - CT coronary angiography
KW - Coronary artery disease
KW - Hybrid imaging
KW - Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992073614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ehjci/jew038
DO - 10.1093/ehjci/jew038
M3 - Article
C2 - 26992419
AN - SCOPUS:84992073614
SN - 2047-2404
VL - 17
SP - 951
EP - 960
JO - European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging
JF - European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging
IS - 9
ER -