Multicenter, multivendor validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping in patients with iron overload at 1.5 T and 3 T

Collin J. Buelo, Julia Velikina, Lu Mao, Ruiyang Zhao, Qing Yuan, Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh, Stefan Ruschke, Dimitrios C. Karampinos, David T. Harris, Ryan J. Mattison, Michael R. Jeng, Ivan Pedrosa, Ihab R. Kamel, Shreyas Vasanawala, Takeshi Yokoo, Scott B. Reeder, Diego Hernando

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of QSM of the liver via single breath-hold chemical shift–encoded MRI at both 1.5 T and 3 T in a multicenter, multivendor study in subjects with iron overload. Methods: This prospective study included four academic medical centers with three different MRI vendors at 1.5 T and 3 T. Subjects with known or suspected liver iron overload underwent multi-echo spoiled gradient-recalled-echo scans at each field strength. A subset received repeatability testing at either 1.5 T or 3 T. Susceptibility and (Formula presented.) maps were reconstructed from the multi-echo images and analyzed at a single center. QSM-measured susceptibility was compared with (Formula presented.) and a commercial R2-based liver iron concentration method across centers and field strengths using linear regression and F-tests on the intercept and slope. Field-strength reproducibility and test/retest repeatability were evaluated using Bland–Altman analysis. Results: A total of 155/80 data sets (test/retest) were available at 1.5 T, and 159/70 data sets (test/retest) were available at 3 T. Calibrations across sites were reproducible, with some variability (e.g., susceptibility slope with liver iron concentration ranged from 0.102 to 0.123 g/[mg (Formula presented.) ppm] across centers at 1.5 T). Field strength reproducibility was good (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.862), and test/retest repeatability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.951). Conclusion: QSM as an imaging biomarker of liver iron overload is feasible and repeatable across centers and MR vendors. It may be complementary with (Formula presented.) as they are obtained from the same acquisition. Although good reproducibility was observed, liver QSM may benefit from standardization of acquisition parameters. Overall, QSM is a promising method for liver iron quantification.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)330-340
Number of pages11
JournalMagnetic Resonance in Medicine
Volume93
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • QSM
  • R2*
  • iron
  • liver
  • susceptibility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multicenter, multivendor validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping in patients with iron overload at 1.5 T and 3 T'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this