TY - JOUR
T1 - Multi-detector CT imaging
T2 - impact of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on detection of vertebral fractures
AU - Sollmann, Nico
AU - Mei, Kai
AU - Hedderich, Dennis M.
AU - Maegerlein, Christian
AU - Kopp, Felix K.
AU - Löffler, Maximilian T.
AU - Zimmer, Claus
AU - Rummeny, Ernst J.
AU - Kirschke, Jan S.
AU - Baum, Thomas
AU - Noël, Peter B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.
PY - 2019/7
Y1 - 2019/7
N2 - Purpose To systematically evaluate the effects of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on image quality and vertebral fracture diagnostics in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Materials and methods In routine MDCT scans of 35 patients (80.0% females, 70.6 ± 14.2 years, 65.7% showing vertebral fractures), reduced radiation doses were retrospectively simulated by virtually lowering tube currents and applying sparse sampling, considering 50%, 25%, and 10% of the original tube current and projections, respectively. Two readers evaluated items of image quality and presence of vertebral fractures. Readout between the evaluations in the original images and those with virtually lowered tube currents or sparse sampling were compared. Results A significant difference was revealed between the evaluations of image quality between MDCT with virtually lowered tube current and sparse-sampled MDCT (p < 0.001). Sparse-sampled data with only 25% of original projections still showed good to very good overall image quality and contrast of vertebrae as well as minimal artifacts. There were no missed fractures in sparse-sampled MDCT with 50% reduction of projections, and clinically acceptable determination of fracture age was possible in MDCT with 75% reduction of projections, in contrast to MDCT with 50% or 75% virtual tube current reduction, respectively. Conclusion Sparse-sampled MDCT provides adequate image quality and diagnostic accuracy for vertebral fracture detection with 50% of original projections in contrast to corresponding MDCT with lowered tube current. Thus, sparse sampling is a promising technique for dose reductions in MDCT that could be introduced in future generations of scanners.
AB - Purpose To systematically evaluate the effects of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on image quality and vertebral fracture diagnostics in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Materials and methods In routine MDCT scans of 35 patients (80.0% females, 70.6 ± 14.2 years, 65.7% showing vertebral fractures), reduced radiation doses were retrospectively simulated by virtually lowering tube currents and applying sparse sampling, considering 50%, 25%, and 10% of the original tube current and projections, respectively. Two readers evaluated items of image quality and presence of vertebral fractures. Readout between the evaluations in the original images and those with virtually lowered tube currents or sparse sampling were compared. Results A significant difference was revealed between the evaluations of image quality between MDCT with virtually lowered tube current and sparse-sampled MDCT (p < 0.001). Sparse-sampled data with only 25% of original projections still showed good to very good overall image quality and contrast of vertebrae as well as minimal artifacts. There were no missed fractures in sparse-sampled MDCT with 50% reduction of projections, and clinically acceptable determination of fracture age was possible in MDCT with 75% reduction of projections, in contrast to MDCT with 50% or 75% virtual tube current reduction, respectively. Conclusion Sparse-sampled MDCT provides adequate image quality and diagnostic accuracy for vertebral fracture detection with 50% of original projections in contrast to corresponding MDCT with lowered tube current. Thus, sparse sampling is a promising technique for dose reductions in MDCT that could be introduced in future generations of scanners.
KW - Bone fractures
KW - Multi-detector computed tomography
KW - Osteoporosis
KW - Radiation exposure
KW - Spine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064155581&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00330-019-06090-2
DO - 10.1007/s00330-019-06090-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 30903337
AN - SCOPUS:85064155581
SN - 0938-7994
VL - 29
SP - 3606
EP - 3616
JO - European Radiology
JF - European Radiology
IS - 7
ER -