Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Multi-criteria decision-making for energy building renovation: Comparing exterior wall structures with the AHP, ANP, utility analysis, and TOPSIS

  • Technical University of Munich
  • Hochschule Bochum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Improving residential building energy efficiency is crucial for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Designing resource-efficient, nearly zero-emission renovations is complex. This study addresses the need for comprehensive frameworks to holistically evaluate building part renovation measures and to provide actionable guidance for strategic planning and implementation across the building life cycle, focusing on exterior walls. Four multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods identify the most environmentally friendly alternative and are compared for rank similarities and decision-making applicability. Methods: The study follows a two-stage approach: (i) applying the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Analytical Network Process (ANP), Utility Analysis (UA), and TOPSIS to rank exterior wall alternatives regarding environmental impacts and circularity and (ii) comparing these methods using the Borda technique, based on correlation and standard deviation metrics and the Wojciech Sałabun (WS) coefficient. A qualitative assessment from a planner's perspective is also included. Results: The results show that different MCDM methods consistently rank the most environmentally friendly renovations, offering clear guidance for strategic implementation. This offers actionable guidance for strategic planning and implementation. The top five alternatives remain consistent across all methods, with slight ranking variations. AHP ranked first by Borda scores, while UA leads by WS coefficient. Curtain walls with timber cladding emerge as the most sustainable choice, outperforming metal cladding and insulated composite structures. Conclusions: The AHP, ANP, UA, and TOPSIS support selecting environmentally friendly building parts. UA and TOPSIS, being more sensitive to emphasized criteria weighting and relatively more applicable in practice, are recommended for building parts’ decision-making.

Original languageEnglish
Article number113075
JournalBuilding and Environment
Volume280
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Jul 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  2. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
  3. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  4. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Keywords

  • Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
  • Analytical Network Process (ANP)
  • Life cycle assessment
  • MCDM
  • Multi-criteria decision-making
  • Renovation
  • TOPSIS
  • Utility analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multi-criteria decision-making for energy building renovation: Comparing exterior wall structures with the AHP, ANP, utility analysis, and TOPSIS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this