TY - JOUR
T1 - MR angiography of the head/neck vascular system in mice on a clinical mri system
AU - Reimann, Carolin
AU - Brangsch, Julia
AU - Adams, Lisa Christine
AU - Thöne-Reineke, Christa
AU - Hamm, Bernd
AU - Makowski, Marcus Richard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Carolin Reimann et al.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) represents a clinical reference standard for the in vivo assessment of the vasculature. In this study, the potential of non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced angiography of the head/neck vasculature in mice on a clinical MR imaging system was tested. Methods. All in vivo magnetic resonance imaging was performed with a 3T clinical system (Siemens). Non-contrast-enhanced (time-of-flight, TOF) and contrast-enhanced angiography (gadofosveset-Trisodium, GdT) were performed in C57BL/6J mouse strain. Lumen-To-muscle ratios (LMRs) and area measurements were assessed. Histology was performed as reference standard of all relevant vascular structures. Results. A close correlation between TOF (R2 = 0.79; p<0.05) and contrast-enhanced (GdT) angiography (R2 = 0.92; p<0.05) with histological area measurements was found. LMRs were comparable between both sequences. Regarding interobserver reproducibility, contrast-enhanced (GdT) angiography yielded a smaller 95% confidence interval and a closer interreader correlation compared to non-contrast-enhanced (TOF) measurements (-0.73-0.89; R2 = 0.81 vs.-0.55-0.56; R2 = 0.94). Conclusion. This study demonstrates that non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced angiographies of the head/neck vasculature of small animals can reliably performed on a clinical 3T MR scanner. Contrast-enhanced angiography enables the visualization of vascular structures with higher intravascular contrast and higher reproducibility.
AB - Background. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) represents a clinical reference standard for the in vivo assessment of the vasculature. In this study, the potential of non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced angiography of the head/neck vasculature in mice on a clinical MR imaging system was tested. Methods. All in vivo magnetic resonance imaging was performed with a 3T clinical system (Siemens). Non-contrast-enhanced (time-of-flight, TOF) and contrast-enhanced angiography (gadofosveset-Trisodium, GdT) were performed in C57BL/6J mouse strain. Lumen-To-muscle ratios (LMRs) and area measurements were assessed. Histology was performed as reference standard of all relevant vascular structures. Results. A close correlation between TOF (R2 = 0.79; p<0.05) and contrast-enhanced (GdT) angiography (R2 = 0.92; p<0.05) with histological area measurements was found. LMRs were comparable between both sequences. Regarding interobserver reproducibility, contrast-enhanced (GdT) angiography yielded a smaller 95% confidence interval and a closer interreader correlation compared to non-contrast-enhanced (TOF) measurements (-0.73-0.89; R2 = 0.81 vs.-0.55-0.56; R2 = 0.94). Conclusion. This study demonstrates that non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced angiographies of the head/neck vasculature of small animals can reliably performed on a clinical 3T MR scanner. Contrast-enhanced angiography enables the visualization of vascular structures with higher intravascular contrast and higher reproducibility.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067111201&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2019/5461809
DO - 10.1155/2019/5461809
M3 - Article
C2 - 31275084
AN - SCOPUS:85067111201
SN - 1555-4309
VL - 2019
JO - Contrast Media and Molecular Imaging
JF - Contrast Media and Molecular Imaging
M1 - 5461809
ER -