TY - GEN
T1 - Motion profile calculation for freeform bending with moveable die based on tool parameters
AU - Werner, Matthias Konrad
AU - Maier, Daniel
AU - Scandola, Lorenzo
AU - Volk, Wolfram
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© ESAFORM 2021 - 24th Inter. Conf. on Mat. Forming. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - In freeform bending the desired geometry is created by defined movements of the die while a continuous feed takes place. To compensate the differences and variations in properties of the semi-finished product, the motion profile has to be adjusted. Currently, this calibration is done once before the manufacturing process of a certain profile. Therefore, numerous iterations consisting of bending and measuring certain radii based on a default motion profile are performed. The measured data is subjected to a curve fit, which is not sufficiently suitable for all profiles and materials setups due to the fixed predefined function that is used. Furthermore, the tool setup is not taken in account. This results in wrong kinematics and production rejects. In this work, an enhanced geometrical model is introduced which incorporates tool parameters - such as distances, clearances and positioning aspects - as a starting point for further calculations. Furthermore, different calibration methods are tested and compared to each other using FEM simulations to fit the calculated curve to the actually used specimen. This work establishes the basis for further compensation and calibration strategies in order to improve the handling of varying properties of semi-finished products within the freeform bending process.
AB - In freeform bending the desired geometry is created by defined movements of the die while a continuous feed takes place. To compensate the differences and variations in properties of the semi-finished product, the motion profile has to be adjusted. Currently, this calibration is done once before the manufacturing process of a certain profile. Therefore, numerous iterations consisting of bending and measuring certain radii based on a default motion profile are performed. The measured data is subjected to a curve fit, which is not sufficiently suitable for all profiles and materials setups due to the fixed predefined function that is used. Furthermore, the tool setup is not taken in account. This results in wrong kinematics and production rejects. In this work, an enhanced geometrical model is introduced which incorporates tool parameters - such as distances, clearances and positioning aspects - as a starting point for further calculations. Furthermore, different calibration methods are tested and compared to each other using FEM simulations to fit the calculated curve to the actually used specimen. This work establishes the basis for further compensation and calibration strategies in order to improve the handling of varying properties of semi-finished products within the freeform bending process.
KW - Calibration
KW - Freeform bending
KW - Motion profile calculation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119364440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.25518/esaform21.1879
DO - 10.25518/esaform21.1879
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85119364440
T3 - ESAFORM 2021 - 24th International Conference on Material Forming
BT - ESAFORM 2021 - 24th International Conference on Material Forming
PB - PoPuPS (University of LiFge Library)
T2 - 24th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming, ESAFORM 2021
Y2 - 14 April 2021 through 16 April 2021
ER -