TY - JOUR
T1 - Morphometry and classification in abdominal aortic aneurysms
T2 - Patient selection for endovascular and open surgery
AU - Schumacher, H.
AU - Eckstein, H. H.
AU - Kallinowski, F.
AU - Allenberg, J. R.
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the anatomic morphology of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and compose a classification system to facilitate patient selection for endovascular graft (EVG) repair. Methods: Data on 242 consecutive AAA patients evaluated on a nonemergent basis in a 3.5-year period to July 1996 were prospectively entered into a registry. Patients were examined using sequential intravenous spiral computed tomographic angiography and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. The data collected and analyzed included: diameters of the supra- and infrarenal aorta, aneurysm, aortoiliac bifurcation, and iliac arteries; lengths of the proximal neck, distal cuff, and aneurysm; degrees of lilac artery tortuosity; and occlusion of the visceral, renal, or iliac arteries. Results: The 242 aneurysms could be easily grouped into three distinctive categories related to the extent of the aneurysmal disease. Type I AAAs (11.2%) had nondilated, thrombus-free infrarenal (15 mm) necks and distal (10 mm) cuffs appropriate for EVG anchoring. In type II and its subgroups (72.3%), a sufficient proximal neck was present, but the aneurysm extended into the lilac arteries; 56% of these were eligible for a bifurcated endograft. In type III (16.5%), a sufficient proximal neck was missing, independent of distal involvement. In all, 51.7% were good EVG candidates based on AAA morphology. Taking into consideration relevant concomitant vascular diseases, proximal iliac kinking, and iliac, renal, or visceral occlusive disease, only 30.2% of the population were potential candidates for an efficient and secure EVG repair using the devices currently available. Conclusions: In contrast to classical open repair, detailed preoperative measurements are recommended for EVG planning. The use of liberal EVG indications may lead to a higher incidence of complications, whereas restrictive morphology-based selection criteria may offer excellent results.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the anatomic morphology of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and compose a classification system to facilitate patient selection for endovascular graft (EVG) repair. Methods: Data on 242 consecutive AAA patients evaluated on a nonemergent basis in a 3.5-year period to July 1996 were prospectively entered into a registry. Patients were examined using sequential intravenous spiral computed tomographic angiography and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. The data collected and analyzed included: diameters of the supra- and infrarenal aorta, aneurysm, aortoiliac bifurcation, and iliac arteries; lengths of the proximal neck, distal cuff, and aneurysm; degrees of lilac artery tortuosity; and occlusion of the visceral, renal, or iliac arteries. Results: The 242 aneurysms could be easily grouped into three distinctive categories related to the extent of the aneurysmal disease. Type I AAAs (11.2%) had nondilated, thrombus-free infrarenal (15 mm) necks and distal (10 mm) cuffs appropriate for EVG anchoring. In type II and its subgroups (72.3%), a sufficient proximal neck was present, but the aneurysm extended into the lilac arteries; 56% of these were eligible for a bifurcated endograft. In type III (16.5%), a sufficient proximal neck was missing, independent of distal involvement. In all, 51.7% were good EVG candidates based on AAA morphology. Taking into consideration relevant concomitant vascular diseases, proximal iliac kinking, and iliac, renal, or visceral occlusive disease, only 30.2% of the population were potential candidates for an efficient and secure EVG repair using the devices currently available. Conclusions: In contrast to classical open repair, detailed preoperative measurements are recommended for EVG planning. The use of liberal EVG indications may lead to a higher incidence of complications, whereas restrictive morphology-based selection criteria may offer excellent results.
KW - endografts
KW - endovascular aneurysm exclusion
KW - endovascular grafts
KW - patient selection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031044380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1583/1074-6218(1997)004<0039:MACIAA>2.0.CO;2
DO - 10.1583/1074-6218(1997)004<0039:MACIAA>2.0.CO;2
M3 - Article
C2 - 9034918
AN - SCOPUS:0031044380
SN - 1074-6218
VL - 4
SP - 39
EP - 44
JO - Journal of Endovascular Surgery
JF - Journal of Endovascular Surgery
IS - 1
ER -