More Than Six Elements per Wavelength: The Practical Use of Structural Finite Element Models and Their Accuracy in Comparison with Experimental Results

P. Langer, M. Maeder, C. Guist, M. Krause, S. Marburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

77 Scopus citations

Abstract

Choosing the right number and type of elements in modern commercial finite element tools is a challenging task. It requires a broad knowledge about the theory behind or much experience by the user. Benchmark tests are a common method to prove the element performance against analytical solutions. However, these tests often analyze the performance only for single elements. When investigating the complete mesh of an arbitrary structure, the comparison of the element's performance is quite challenging due to the lack of closed or fully converged solutions. The purpose of this paper is to show a high-precision comparison of eigenfrequencies of a real structure between experimental and numerical results in the context of an element performance check with respect to a converged solution. Additionally, the authors identify the practically relevant accuracy of simulation and experiment. Finally, the influence of accuracy with respect to the number of elements per standing structural bending wave is shown.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1750025
JournalJournal of Computational Acoustics
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2017

Keywords

  • Finite element method
  • accuracy evaluation
  • experimental modal analysis
  • experimental validation
  • finite element modeling
  • uncertainty quantification
  • virtual prototyping

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'More Than Six Elements per Wavelength: The Practical Use of Structural Finite Element Models and Their Accuracy in Comparison with Experimental Results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this