Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Modernizing persistence–bioaccumulation–toxicity (PBT) assessment with high throughput animal-free methods

  • Beate I. Escher
  • , Rolf Altenburger
  • , Matthias Blüher
  • , John K. Colbourne
  • , Ralf Ebinghaus
  • , Peter Fantke
  • , Michaela Hein
  • , Wolfgang Köck
  • , Klaus Kümmerer
  • , Sina Leipold
  • , Xiaojing Li
  • , Martin Scheringer
  • , Stefan Scholz
  • , Michael Schloter
  • , Pia Johanna Schweizer
  • , Tamara Tal
  • , Igor Tetko
  • , Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann
  • , Lukas Y. Wick
  • , Kathrin Fenner
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ
  • University of Tübingen
  • University of Leipzig
  • University of Birmingham
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon outstation at Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ)
  • Technical University of Denmark
  • Leuphana University Lüneburg
  • International Sustainable Chemistry Collaboration Centre (ISC3)
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena
  • ETH Zurich
  • Helmholtz Zentrum München German Research Center for Environmental Health
  • Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies
  • University Hospital Augsburg
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
  • University of Zurich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

The assessment of persistence (P), bioaccumulation (B), and toxicity (T) of a chemical is a crucial first step at ensuring chemical safety and is a cornerstone of the European Union’s chemicals regulation REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals). Existing methods for PBT assessment are overly complex and cumbersome, have produced incorrect conclusions, and rely heavily on animal-intensive testing. We explore how new-approach methodologies (NAMs) can overcome the limitations of current PBT assessment. We propose two innovative hazard indicators, termed cumulative toxicity equivalents (CTE) and persistent toxicity equivalents (PTE). Together they are intended to replace existing PBT indicators and can also accommodate the emerging concept of PMT (where M stands for mobility). The proposed “toxicity equivalents” can be measured with high throughput in vitro bioassays. CTE refers to the toxic effects measured directly in any given sample, including single chemicals, substitution products, or mixtures. PTE is the equivalent measure of cumulative toxicity equivalents measured after simulated environmental degradation of the sample. With an appropriate panel of animal-free or alternative in vitro bioassays, CTE and PTE comprise key environmental and human health hazard indicators. CTE and PTE do not require analytical identification of transformation products and mixture components but instead prompt two key questions: is the chemical or mixture toxic, and is this toxicity persistent or can it be attenuated by environmental degradation? Taken together, the proposed hazard indicators CTE and PTE have the potential to integrate P, B/M and T assessment into one high-throughput experimental workflow that sidesteps the need for analytical measurements and will support the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability of the European Union.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1267-1283
Number of pages17
JournalArchives of Toxicology
Volume97
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2023
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Biodegradation
  • Hazard assessment
  • In vitro bioassay
  • Mobility
  • New approach methodologies (NAMs)
  • Persistence
  • Toxicity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modernizing persistence–bioaccumulation–toxicity (PBT) assessment with high throughput animal-free methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this