Abstract
For many years, injectable substances have been in use for the treatment of incontinence. We examined different methods of injecting glutaraldehyde cross-linked bovine collagen injection for their effectivness in treatment of genuine stress incontinence. In the first group of patients collagen injection was done under endo-ultrasound guidance. In the second group an endoscopic system was used. There was no major difference in patient selection for the two groups. Incontinence symptoms became less severe in only 5 of 15 (33 %) patients in the endo-ultrasound group, who then had moderate stress incontinence. Endoscopic collagen treatment resulted in social continence in 15 of the 22 (68.2 %) patients. We conclude that endoscopic collagen is superior to endo-ultrasound-guided collagen injection in the treatment of incontinence.
| Translated title of the contribution | Minimally invasive treatment of stress incontinence two alternative methods endo-sonographic vs transurethral of collagen injection |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Pages (from-to) | 6-10 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Urologe - Ausgabe A |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - 1996 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Minimally invasive treatment of stress incontinence two alternative methods endo-sonographic vs transurethral of collagen injection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver