Minimal invasive behandlung der streßharninkontinenz durch kollagenapplikation

Translated title of the contribution: Minimally invasive treatment of stress incontinence two alternative methods endo-sonographic vs transurethral of collagen injection

H. W. Gottfried, S. Maier, J. Gschwend, E. Brändle, R. E. Hautmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

For many years, injectable substances have been in use for the treatment of incontinence. We examined different methods of injecting glutaraldehyde cross-linked bovine collagen injection for their effectivness in treatment of genuine stress incontinence. In the first group of patients collagen injection was done under endo-ultrasound guidance. In the second group an endoscopic system was used. There was no major difference in patient selection for the two groups. Incontinence symptoms became less severe in only 5 of 15 (33 %) patients in the endo-ultrasound group, who then had moderate stress incontinence. Endoscopic collagen treatment resulted in social continence in 15 of the 22 (68.2 %) patients. We conclude that endoscopic collagen is superior to endo-ultrasound-guided collagen injection in the treatment of incontinence.

Translated title of the contributionMinimally invasive treatment of stress incontinence two alternative methods endo-sonographic vs transurethral of collagen injection
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)6-10
Number of pages5
JournalUrologe - Ausgabe A
Volume35
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Minimally invasive treatment of stress incontinence two alternative methods endo-sonographic vs transurethral of collagen injection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this