Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

METHODENVERGLEICH ZUR FRUHERKENNUNG EINER LARMVULNERABILITAT DES INNENOHRES. AMPLITUDENREDUKTION OTOAKUSTISCHER EMISSIONEN AM EMPFINDLICHSTEN BEI SUBRISKANTER IMPULSSCHALLREIZUNG

Translated title of the contribution: A comparison of different audiometric methods for early detection of a vulnerable cochlea. Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Noise-induced temporary impairment of cochlear function was measured with several audiometric tests in order to evaluate which method best predicts a vulnerable cochlea. We tested 10 normally-hearing and 13 subjects who were positive for temporary threshold shifts (TTS). The latter were selected from 194 soldiers who demonstrated a TTS higher than 15 dB after regular training with firearms. Acoustic distortion products (DPOAE), click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), upper limit of hearing (ULH) and pure-tone and high-frequency audiometry were used to evaluate possible increased vulnerability of the cochlea. Tests were conducted at lower sound intensities (white noise, 90 dB SPL. 5 min; impact noise, 100 or 106 dB SPL(S), 10 impulses/s, 5 min). Seventy per cent of the TTS-positive soldiers studied exhibited significant reductions of TEOAE amplitudes, whereas a stable emission was observed in all control subjects. DPOAE alterations were seen in 38% of the soldiers tested. These results indicate that TEOAE is the most sensitive, objective method for detecting a positive disturbance in cochlear function. Although the upper limit of hearing was also a very sensitive method, variability of this psychoacoustic method depended on the help and experience of the subjects being tested.

Translated title of the contributionA comparison of different audiometric methods for early detection of a vulnerable cochlea. Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)89-97
Number of pages9
JournalHNO
Volume43
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of different audiometric methods for early detection of a vulnerable cochlea. Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this