Mechanische untersuchung von interkorporellen wirbelsäulen-implantaten - Besonderheiten und grenzen einer normgerechten testung

Translated title of the contribution: Mechanical testing of spinal interbody implants - Characteristics and limitations of a standardized testing procedure

E. Steinhauser, R. Bader, H. Rechl, R. Bertagnoli, W. Mittelmeier, R. Gradinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Spinal interbody fusion has proved to be a useful procedure for the surgical stabilization of spinal segments, for which fusion cases made of metal or reinforced polymers are increasingly being used. For the mechanical testing of spinal interbody implants, a test setup has been developed on the basis of an ASTM proposal. Initially, testing of lumbar fusion cages made of CFRP (carbon fibre reinforced polymer) was carried out. The implants (UNION Cages, Medtronic Sofamor Danek), which are characterised by their radiolucency on radiography, NMR and CT scans, have a cube-shaped body with three tabletracks on the under and upper surfaces. The cages were tested at different loads. Modifications of the proposed standardized method were carried out to enable implementation of implant-oriented testing. The tested cages were shown to have adequate axial compression, shear and torsional strengths with regard to the implant body. The maximum axial compression force tolerated by the tabletracks was less than the maximal potential loading of the lumbar spine, and, with account being taken of implant design, consequences with regard to surgical technique were drawn. As dictated by the geometry of the table-tracks, parallel grooves have to be made intra-operatively in the vertebral end plates. Axial compressive loads then act on the implant body, and the table-tracks are protected from damage. To avoid in vivo failure, the tested cages should be implanted only when this specific surgical technique is employed. Using supplementary anterior or posterior instrumentation, in vivo failure of the table-tracks under physiological spinal loading is not to be expected.

Translated title of the contributionMechanical testing of spinal interbody implants - Characteristics and limitations of a standardized testing procedure
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)325-332
Number of pages8
JournalBiomedizinische Technik
Volume46
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanical testing of spinal interbody implants - Characteristics and limitations of a standardized testing procedure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this