TY - JOUR
T1 - Management of functional somatic syndromes
AU - Henningsen, Peter
AU - Zipfel, Stephan
AU - Herzog, Wolfgang
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to Heribert Sattel for help with the literature search and to Bernd Löwe for valuable support. We are also indebted to Paul Enck and three anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier draft. Supported in part by DFG (PISO) and BMBF (Funktional).
PY - 2007/3/17
Y1 - 2007/3/17
N2 - Although functional somatic syndromes (FSS) show substantial overlap, treatment research is mostly confined to single syndromes, with a lack of valid and generally accepted diagnostic criteria across medical specialties. Here, we review management for the full variety of FSS, drawn from systematic reviews and meta-analyses since 2001, and give recommendations for a stepped care approach that differentiates between uncomplicated and complicated FSS. Non-pharmacological treatments involving active participation of patients, such as exercise and psychotherapy, seem to be more effective than those that involve passive physical measures, including injections and operations. Pharmacological agents with CNS action seem to be more consistently effective than drugs aiming at restoration of peripheral physiological dysfunction. A balance between biomedical, organ-oriented, and cognitive interpersonal approaches is most appropriate at this truly psychosomatic interface. In view of the iatrogenic component in the maintenance of FSS, doctor-centred interventions and close observation of the doctor-patient relationship are of particular importance.
AB - Although functional somatic syndromes (FSS) show substantial overlap, treatment research is mostly confined to single syndromes, with a lack of valid and generally accepted diagnostic criteria across medical specialties. Here, we review management for the full variety of FSS, drawn from systematic reviews and meta-analyses since 2001, and give recommendations for a stepped care approach that differentiates between uncomplicated and complicated FSS. Non-pharmacological treatments involving active participation of patients, such as exercise and psychotherapy, seem to be more effective than those that involve passive physical measures, including injections and operations. Pharmacological agents with CNS action seem to be more consistently effective than drugs aiming at restoration of peripheral physiological dysfunction. A balance between biomedical, organ-oriented, and cognitive interpersonal approaches is most appropriate at this truly psychosomatic interface. In view of the iatrogenic component in the maintenance of FSS, doctor-centred interventions and close observation of the doctor-patient relationship are of particular importance.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33947140969
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60159-7
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60159-7
M3 - Review article
C2 - 17368156
AN - SCOPUS:33947140969
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 369
SP - 946
EP - 955
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 9565
ER -