TY - JOUR
T1 - Management of acetabular fractures in the geriatric patient
AU - Hanschen, Marc
AU - Pesch, Sebastian
AU - Huber-Wagner, Stefan
AU - Biberthaler, Peter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Introduction: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is standard care for most acetabular fractures. With increasing numbers of acetabular fractures in the elderly, the risk of revision surgery and conversion to total hip replacement (THR) is increasing. Alarmingly, about 20-25% of acetabular fractures in the elderly following ORIF needed revision and conversion to delayed THR. Methods: Recently, prognostic factors have been identified, which correlate with an increased risk of worse outcomes following ORIF of acetabular fractures in the elderly patient. Patient risk factors include, for example, age, comorbidities, and degree of osteoporosis. Injury risk factors mainly include the fracture pattern. Results: The concept of primary THR following acetabular fractures is an alternative to ORIF, especially in the elderly patient. Satisfactory outcomes have been reported in different studies for primary THR following acetabular fractures in the elderly. The surgeon should be aware of strict selection criteria in order to achieve these satisfactory outcomes. Therefore, an individualized treatment plan has to be defined for elderly patients following acetabular fractures. Discussion: Here, the advantages and disadvantages of ORIF versus THR following acetabular fractures in the elderly are discussed.
AB - Introduction: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is standard care for most acetabular fractures. With increasing numbers of acetabular fractures in the elderly, the risk of revision surgery and conversion to total hip replacement (THR) is increasing. Alarmingly, about 20-25% of acetabular fractures in the elderly following ORIF needed revision and conversion to delayed THR. Methods: Recently, prognostic factors have been identified, which correlate with an increased risk of worse outcomes following ORIF of acetabular fractures in the elderly patient. Patient risk factors include, for example, age, comorbidities, and degree of osteoporosis. Injury risk factors mainly include the fracture pattern. Results: The concept of primary THR following acetabular fractures is an alternative to ORIF, especially in the elderly patient. Satisfactory outcomes have been reported in different studies for primary THR following acetabular fractures in the elderly. The surgeon should be aware of strict selection criteria in order to achieve these satisfactory outcomes. Therefore, an individualized treatment plan has to be defined for elderly patients following acetabular fractures. Discussion: Here, the advantages and disadvantages of ORIF versus THR following acetabular fractures in the elderly are discussed.
KW - Acetabular fracture
KW - Elderly patient
KW - Individualized treatment
KW - Injury risk factors
KW - Patient risk factors
KW - Primary total hip replacement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051644796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1051/sicotj/2017026
DO - 10.1051/sicotj/2017026
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85051644796
SN - 2426-8887
VL - 3
JO - SICOT-J
JF - SICOT-J
M1 - 37
ER -