Lower bounds on the sizes of integer programs without additional variables

Volker Kaibel, Stefan Weltge

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

For a given set X ⊆ Z d of integer points, we investigate the smallest number of facets of any polyhedron whose set of integer points is conv(X) ∩ Z d . This quantity, which we call the relaxation complexity of X, corresponds to the smallest number of linear inequalities of any integer program having X as the set of feasible solutions that does not use auxiliary variables. We show that the use of auxiliary variables is essential for constructing polynomial size integer programming formulations in many relevant cases. In particular, we provide asymptotically tight exponential lower bounds on the relaxation complexity of the integer points of several well-known combinatorial polytopes, including the traveling salesman polytope and the spanning tree polytope.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInteger Programming and Combinatorial Optimization - 17th International Conference, IPCO 2014, Proceedings
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages321-332
Number of pages12
ISBN (Print)9783319075563
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes
Event17th International Conference on Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, IPCO 2014 - Bonn, Germany
Duration: 23 Jun 201425 Jun 2014

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume8494 LNCS
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Conference

Conference17th International Conference on Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, IPCO 2014
Country/TerritoryGermany
CityBonn
Period23/06/1425/06/14

Keywords

  • auxiliary variables
  • integer programming
  • relaxations
  • tsp

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lower bounds on the sizes of integer programs without additional variables'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this