TY - JOUR
T1 - Low-dose MDCT of patients with spinal instrumentation using sparse sampling
T2 - Impact on metal artifacts
AU - Sollmann, Nico
AU - Mei, Kai
AU - Riederer, Isabelle
AU - Schon, Simon
AU - Kirschke, Jan S.
AU - Meyer, Bernhard
AU - Zimmer, Claus
AU - Baum, Thomas
AU - Noel, Peter B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Roentgen Ray Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate simulated sparse-sampled MDCT combined with statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) for low-dose imaging of patients with spinal instrumentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-eight patients with implanted hardware after spinal instrumentation (24 patients with short- or long-term instrumentation-related complications [i.e., adjacent segment disease, screw loosening or implant failure, or postoperative hematoma or seroma] and 14 control subjects with no complications) underwent MDCT. Scans were simulated as if they were performed with 50% (P50), 25% (P25), 10% (P10), and 5% (P5) of the projections of the original acquisition using an inhouse- developed SIR algorithm for advanced image reconstructions. Two readers performed qualitative image evaluations of overall image quality and artifacts, image contrast, inspection of the spinal canal, and diagnostic confidence (1 = high, 2 = medium, and 3 = low confidence). RESULTS. Although overall image quality decreased and artifacts increased with reductions in the number of projections, all complications were detected by both readers when 100% of the projections of the original acquisition (P100), P50, and P25 imaging data were used. For P25 data, diagnostic confidence was still high (mean score ± SD: Reader 1, 1.2 ± 0.4; reader 2, 1.3 ± 0.5), and interreader agreement was substantial to almost perfect (weighted Cohen κ. = 0.787-0.855). The mean volumetric CT dose index was 3.2 mGy for P25 data in comparison with 12.6 mGy for the original acquisition (P100 data). CONCLUSION. The use of sparse sampling and SIR for low-dose MDCT in patients with spinal instrumentation facilitated considerable reductions in radiation exposure. The use of P25 data with SIR resulted in no missed complications related to spinal instrumentation and allowed high diagnostic confidence, so using only 25% of the projections is probably enough for accurate and confident diagnostic detection of major instrumentation- related complications.
AB - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate simulated sparse-sampled MDCT combined with statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) for low-dose imaging of patients with spinal instrumentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-eight patients with implanted hardware after spinal instrumentation (24 patients with short- or long-term instrumentation-related complications [i.e., adjacent segment disease, screw loosening or implant failure, or postoperative hematoma or seroma] and 14 control subjects with no complications) underwent MDCT. Scans were simulated as if they were performed with 50% (P50), 25% (P25), 10% (P10), and 5% (P5) of the projections of the original acquisition using an inhouse- developed SIR algorithm for advanced image reconstructions. Two readers performed qualitative image evaluations of overall image quality and artifacts, image contrast, inspection of the spinal canal, and diagnostic confidence (1 = high, 2 = medium, and 3 = low confidence). RESULTS. Although overall image quality decreased and artifacts increased with reductions in the number of projections, all complications were detected by both readers when 100% of the projections of the original acquisition (P100), P50, and P25 imaging data were used. For P25 data, diagnostic confidence was still high (mean score ± SD: Reader 1, 1.2 ± 0.4; reader 2, 1.3 ± 0.5), and interreader agreement was substantial to almost perfect (weighted Cohen κ. = 0.787-0.855). The mean volumetric CT dose index was 3.2 mGy for P25 data in comparison with 12.6 mGy for the original acquisition (P100 data). CONCLUSION. The use of sparse sampling and SIR for low-dose MDCT in patients with spinal instrumentation facilitated considerable reductions in radiation exposure. The use of P25 data with SIR resulted in no missed complications related to spinal instrumentation and allowed high diagnostic confidence, so using only 25% of the projections is probably enough for accurate and confident diagnostic detection of major instrumentation- related complications.
KW - Artifacts
KW - Image enhancement
KW - MDCT
KW - Postoperative complications
KW - Spine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105273894&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2214/AJR.20.23083
DO - 10.2214/AJR.20.23083
M3 - Article
C2 - 33703925
AN - SCOPUS:85105273894
SN - 0361-803X
VL - 216
SP - 1308
EP - 1317
JO - American Journal of Roentgenology
JF - American Journal of Roentgenology
IS - 5
ER -