TY - JOUR
T1 - Loss of CDX2 in colorectal cancer is associated with histopathologic subtypes and microsatellite instability but is prognostically inferior to hematoxylin–eosin-based morphologic parameters from the WHO classification
AU - Konukiewitz, Björn
AU - Schmitt, Maxime
AU - Silva, Miguel
AU - Pohl, Junika
AU - Lang, Corinna
AU - Steiger, Katja
AU - Halfter, Kathrin
AU - Engel, Jutta
AU - Schlitter, Anna Melissa
AU - Boxberg, Melanie
AU - Pfarr, Nicole
AU - Wilhelm, Dirk
AU - Foersch, Sebastian
AU - Tschurtschenthaler, Markus
AU - Weichert, Wilko
AU - Jesinghaus, Moritz
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12/7
Y1 - 2021/12/7
N2 - Background: Immunohistochemical loss of CDX2 has been proposed as a biomarker of dismal survival in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), especially in UICC Stage II/III. However, it remains unclear, how CDX2 expression is related to central hematoxylin–eosin (HE)-based morphologic parameters defined by 2019 WHO classification and how its prognostic relevance is compared to these parameters. Methods: We evaluated CDX2 expression in 1003 CRCs and explored its prognostic relevance compared to CRC subtypes, tumour budding and WHO grade in the overall cohort and in specific subgroups. Results: CDX2-low/absent CRCs were enriched in specific morphologic subtypes, right-sided and microsatellite-instable (MSI-H) CRCs (P < 0.001) and showed worse survival characteristics in the overall cohort/UICC Stage II/III (e.g. DFS: P = 0.005) and in microsatellite stable and left-sided CRCs, but not in MSI-H or right-sided CRCs. Compared with CDX2, all HE-based markers showed a significantly better prognostic discrimination in all scenarios. In multivariate analyses including all morphologic parameters, CDX2 was not an independent prognostic factor. Conclusion: CDX2 loss has some prognostic impact in univariate analyses, but its prognostic relevance is considerably lower compared to central HE-based morphologic parameters defined by the WHO classification and vanishes in multivariate analyses incorporating these factors.
AB - Background: Immunohistochemical loss of CDX2 has been proposed as a biomarker of dismal survival in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), especially in UICC Stage II/III. However, it remains unclear, how CDX2 expression is related to central hematoxylin–eosin (HE)-based morphologic parameters defined by 2019 WHO classification and how its prognostic relevance is compared to these parameters. Methods: We evaluated CDX2 expression in 1003 CRCs and explored its prognostic relevance compared to CRC subtypes, tumour budding and WHO grade in the overall cohort and in specific subgroups. Results: CDX2-low/absent CRCs were enriched in specific morphologic subtypes, right-sided and microsatellite-instable (MSI-H) CRCs (P < 0.001) and showed worse survival characteristics in the overall cohort/UICC Stage II/III (e.g. DFS: P = 0.005) and in microsatellite stable and left-sided CRCs, but not in MSI-H or right-sided CRCs. Compared with CDX2, all HE-based markers showed a significantly better prognostic discrimination in all scenarios. In multivariate analyses including all morphologic parameters, CDX2 was not an independent prognostic factor. Conclusion: CDX2 loss has some prognostic impact in univariate analyses, but its prognostic relevance is considerably lower compared to central HE-based morphologic parameters defined by the WHO classification and vanishes in multivariate analyses incorporating these factors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116500296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41416-021-01553-0
DO - 10.1038/s41416-021-01553-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 34616012
AN - SCOPUS:85116500296
SN - 0007-0920
VL - 125
SP - 1632
EP - 1646
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
IS - 12
ER -