Loopy proteins appear conserved in evolution

Jinfeng Liu, Hepan Tan, Burkhard Rost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

169 Scopus citations

Abstract

Over the last decade, structural biologists have unravelled many proteins that appear natively disordered. Common assumptions are that many of these proteins adopt structure through binding and that the structural flexibility enables them to adopt different functions. Here, we investigated regions of more than 70 sequence-consecutive residues that have no regular secondary structure (NORS). Analysing 31 entirely sequenced organisms, we predicted five times as many proteins with NORS regions (loopy proteins) in eukaryotes (20%) than in prokaryotes and archaeas (4%). Thousands of these NORS regions were over 150 residues long. The amino acid composition of NORS regions differed from that of loops in PDB. Although NORS proteins had significantly more residues in low-complexity regions than other proteins, simple cut-off thresholds for sequence bias missed most NORS regions. On average, NORS regions were evolutionarily at least as conserved as their flanking regions. Furthermore, yeast proteins with NORS regions had more protein-protein interaction partners than other proteins. Regulatory and transcription-related functions were over-represented in loopy proteins, biosynthesis and energy metabolism were under-represented. Overall, our analysis confirmed that proteins with non-regular structures appear to play important functional roles, and they may adopt as yet unknown types of protein structures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-64
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Molecular Biology
Volume322
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Disordered regions
  • Natively unstructured proteins
  • Protein function
  • Protein-protein interactions
  • Regular secondary structure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Loopy proteins appear conserved in evolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this