TY - JOUR
T1 - Localization in reverberation with cochlear implants
T2 - Predicting performance from basic psychophysical measures
AU - Kerber, Stefan
AU - Seeber, Bernhard U.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by the Intramural Programme of the Medical Research Council (UK, grant U135097132) and Cochlear Europe Ltd. We thank Paula Greenham and Brendan Murray at Cochlear Ltd. for their support. Ian Wiggins gave helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We also thank the participants who donated their time and gave us valuable insight into what it means to listen through CIs in difficult environments. We are thankful for help with patient recruitment to Helen Cullington at the South of England Cochlear Implant Centre, Southampton, to Louise Craddock and Sandra Gerges at the Birmingham Adult Cochlear Implant Programme, to Simon Freeman and Deborah Mawman at the University Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery at Manchester Royal Infirmary, to Tracey Twomey and Ellen Jeffs at the Hearing Services Ropewalk House, Nottingham, to Gerard O’Donoghue at the ENT department, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, and to The Ear Foundation in Nottingham.
PY - 2013/6
Y1 - 2013/6
N2 - Users of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) experience difficulties localizing sounds in reverberant rooms, even in rooms where normal-hearing listeners would hardly notice the reverberation. We measured the localization ability of seven bilateral CI users listening with their own devices in anechoic space and in a simulated reverberant room. To determine factors affecting performance in reverberant space we measured the sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level differences (ILDs), and forward masking in the same participants using direct computer control of the electric stimulation in their CIs. Localization performance, quantified by the coefficient of determination r 2 and the root mean squared error, was significantly worse in the reverberant room than in anechoic conditions. Localization performance in the anechoic room, expressed as r 2, was best predicted by subject's sensitivity to ILDs. However, the decrease in localization performance caused by reverberation was better predicted by the sensitivity to envelope ITDs measured on single electrode pairs, with a correlation coefficient of 0.92. The CI users who were highly sensitive to envelope ITDs also better maintained their localization ability in reverberant space. Results in the forward masking task added only marginally to the predictions of localization performance in both environments. The results indicate that envelope ITDs provided by CI processors support localization in reverberant space. Thus, methods that improve perceptual access to envelope ITDs could help improve localization with bilateral CIs in everyday listening situations.
AB - Users of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) experience difficulties localizing sounds in reverberant rooms, even in rooms where normal-hearing listeners would hardly notice the reverberation. We measured the localization ability of seven bilateral CI users listening with their own devices in anechoic space and in a simulated reverberant room. To determine factors affecting performance in reverberant space we measured the sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level differences (ILDs), and forward masking in the same participants using direct computer control of the electric stimulation in their CIs. Localization performance, quantified by the coefficient of determination r 2 and the root mean squared error, was significantly worse in the reverberant room than in anechoic conditions. Localization performance in the anechoic room, expressed as r 2, was best predicted by subject's sensitivity to ILDs. However, the decrease in localization performance caused by reverberation was better predicted by the sensitivity to envelope ITDs measured on single electrode pairs, with a correlation coefficient of 0.92. The CI users who were highly sensitive to envelope ITDs also better maintained their localization ability in reverberant space. Results in the forward masking task added only marginally to the predictions of localization performance in both environments. The results indicate that envelope ITDs provided by CI processors support localization in reverberant space. Thus, methods that improve perceptual access to envelope ITDs could help improve localization with bilateral CIs in everyday listening situations.
KW - binaural sensitivity
KW - forward masking
KW - interaural level differences
KW - interaural time differences
KW - reverberation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879084021&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10162-013-0378-z
DO - 10.1007/s10162-013-0378-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 23440517
AN - SCOPUS:84879084021
SN - 1525-3961
VL - 14
SP - 379
EP - 392
JO - JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
JF - JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
IS - 3
ER -