Limitations of titanium dioxide and aluminum oxide as ossicular replacement materials: An evaluation of the effects of porosity on ceramic prostheses

Keyphrases

• Rutile 100%
• Aluminum Oxide 100%
• Titanium Aluminum Alloy 100%
• Replacement Material 100%
• Porosity Effect 100%
• Ossicular Replacement 100%
• Ceramic Prostheses 100%
• Prosthesis 66%
• Macroporous 66%
• Implant Materials 66%
• Scanning Electron Microscopy 33%
• Biocompatibility 33%
• In Situ 33%
• Light Microscopy 33%
• Porosity 33%
• Long-term Stability 33%
• Morphological Changes 33%
• Light Scanning 33%
• Infiltration 33%
• Implant Placement 33%
• Al2O3 Oxide 33%
• Inflammatory Cells 33%
• Mucosa 33%
• Biological Environment 33%
• Middle Ear 33%
• Unique Environment 33%
• Fissure 33%
• Middle Ear Prosthesis 33%
• Osseous 33%
• Petrous Bone 33%
• Oxide Ceramics 33%
• Ossiculoplasty 33%
• Tympanic Cavity 33%
• Microporous TiO2 33%
• Manual Manipulation 33%
• Partial Ossicular Replacement Prosthesis 33%

Material Science

• Aluminum Oxide 100%
• Titanium Dioxide 100%
• Al2O3 40%
• Implant Material 40%
• Scanning Electron Microscopy 20%
• Oxide Ceramics 20%
• Biocompatibility 20%
• Morphology 20%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine

• Tympanic Cavity 50%