Abstract
Purpose: We analyzed the lumbosacral segmental geometry and clinical outcome in patients undergoing L5 corpectomy. Methods: Fourteen consecutive patients who underwent L5 (n = 12) or L4 + 5 (n = 2) corpectomy at our department between January 2010 and April 2015 were included. All patients underwent a baseline physical and neurologic examination on admission. The diagnostic routine included MRI and CT scans and, if possible, an upright X-ray of the lumbar spine before and after surgery. The local lordosis angle [L4(L3)-S1] was measured. Results: The most common pathology was infection (N = 7), followed by neoplastic disease (n = 3), pseudarthrosis (n = 2) after previous spinal fusion procedures and burst fractures (n = 2) of the L5 vertebral body. We observed seven complications (2 intraoperative; 5 postoperative) in five (36%) patients. Three patients needed revision surgery because of cage subsidence and/or dislodgement (21%). Additional anterior plating was used in two of the revision surgeries to secure the cage. Two spondylodiscitis patients (14%) with complications died of sepsis. Of the 12 remaining patients, 8 were available for follow-up. Conclusion: L5 corpectomy is a technically challenging but feasible procedure even though the overall complication rate can be as high as 36%. The radiologic and clinical outcome seems to be better in patients with a small lordosis angle between L4(L3) and S1, since an angle of >50 degrees seems to facilitate cage dislodgement. Anterior plating should be considered in these cases to prevent implant failure.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1147-1152 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Acta Neurochirurgica |
| Volume | 159 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jun 2017 |
Keywords
- Anterior lumbar fusion
- L5 corpectomy
- Lumbosacral junction
- Sagittal balance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'L5 corpectomy—the lumbosacral segmental geometry and clinical outcome—a consecutive series of 14 patients and review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver