Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Kommentar zu den Leitlinien (2018) der ESC und EACTS zur Myokardrevaskularisation

Translated title of the contribution: Comments on the 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization
  • F. J. Neumann
  • , R. A. Byrne
  • , D. Sibbing
  • , A. Kastrati
  • , N. Frey
  • , T. Doenst
  • , J. Gummert
  • , A. M. Zeiher
  • , V. Falk
  • University Heart Center Freiburg
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
  • University Heart Center
  • University Hospital of the Ruhr-University Bochum
  • Klinikum der J. W. Goethe-Universität
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The guidelines are intended to support the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease by pragmatic evidence-based recommendations. Myocardial revascularization is indicated in order to alleviate symptoms of myocardial ischemia and/or to reduce long-term mortality and morbidity. The greater the risk of ischaemia for the myocardium, the greater the prognostic benefit, which critically depends on the ability to achieve complete revascularization. Apart from cases with high-grade stenosis of large vessels, angiographic assessment alone does not suffice in order to determine if myocardial revascularization should be carried out; instead, documentation of the haemodynamic relevance by non-invasive functional testing or intracoronary physiological measurements are needed. Both percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are capable of improving the prognosis when correctly indicated. The use of PCI is associated with faster recovery and lower risk of early complications, including stroke, whereas for multivessel disease with or without left main stenosis CABG in general reduces mortality and morbidity in the long run. The difference in long-term outcome between the two modalities greatly depends on the complexity of the coronary artery disease and the presence of diabetes mellitus; it is negligible with low complexity coronary artery disease but substantial with high complexity, especially in combination with diabetes. Therefore, in addition to the perioperative risk and the technical feasibility, the criteria for deciding between PCI and CABG are the extent of coronary artery involvement as gauged by the SYNTAX score, the presence of left main stem stenosis, diabetes and the possibility to achieve complete revascularization. Recommendations for individualized treatment decisions respecting the patient’s preference are best made by the heart team. The guidelines also give recommendations for myocardial revascularization in specific clinical settings, on technical aspects of PCI and CABG, as well as on adjunctive therapy.

Translated title of the contributionComments on the 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)181-192
Number of pages12
JournalKardiologe
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comments on the 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this