Abstract
Prognostic and predictive factors are the prerequisite for risk-adapted, individualized therapy decisions in primary breast cancer. Established prognostic factors (lymph node status, grading, tumor size, steroid hormone receptor status) do not achieve optimal identification of high-risk patients. Thus, identification of new and better prognostic factors is a clinically relevant task. In particular, in node-negative breast cancer patients, new tumor-biological factors are needed as selection criteria for adjuvant systemic therapy. For this purpose, factors describing a tumor's potential for invasion and metastasis (uPA, PAI-1, cathepsin D) or its proliferative activity (S-phase, Ki-67) have been put forward in the literature. This review focuses on a direct comparison of these two groups of tumor biological factors taking into account our own data as well as published results.
| Translated title of the contribution | Clinical relevance of tumor invasion and proliferation factors in breast cancer |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Pages (from-to) | 374-381 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 1998 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical relevance of tumor invasion and proliferation factors in breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver