Kann Paul besser argumentieren als Marie? Betrachtungen zur Beweiskompetenz von Mädchen und Jungen aus differentieller Perspektive: Eine Reanalyse von vier empirischen Untersuchungen

Aiso Heinze; Stephan Kessler; Sebastian Kuntze; Anke Lindmeier; Marianne Moormann; Kristina Reiss; Franziska Rudolph-Albert; Luzia Zöttl

doi:10.1007/BF03339049

Kann Paul besser argumentieren als Marie? Betrachtungen zur Beweiskompetenz von Mädchen und Jungen aus differentieller Perspektive: Eine Reanalyse von vier empirischen Untersuchungen

Aiso Heinze, Stephan Kessler, Sebastian Kuntze, Anke Lindmeier, Marianne Moormann, Kristina Reiss, Franziska Rudolph-Albert, Luzia Zöttl

University of Munich

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article presents results of a re-analysis of four quantitative empirical studies on geometrical reasoning and proof at the lower secondary level. It aims at identifying possible gender effects with respect to this competency. The re-analysis encompasses data of nearly 2800 students from grade 7 respectively grade 8. The results confirm those of some international studies and suggest only minor gender differences. They explain a comparably small amount of the variance in mathematical performance.

Original language	German
Pages (from-to)	148-167
Number of pages	20
Journal	Journal fur Mathematik-Didaktik
Volume	28
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339049
State	Published - 2007
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1007/BF03339049

Cite this

Heinze, A., Kessler, S., Kuntze, S., Lindmeier, A., Moormann, M., Reiss, K., Rudolph-Albert, F., & Zöttl, L. (2007). Kann Paul besser argumentieren als Marie? Betrachtungen zur Beweiskompetenz von Mädchen und Jungen aus differentieller Perspektive: Eine Reanalyse von vier empirischen Untersuchungen. Journal fur Mathematik-Didaktik, 28(2), 148-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339049

@article{256a14d718a449729f90aed5eee05297,

title = "Kann Paul besser argumentieren als Marie? Betrachtungen zur Beweiskompetenz von M{\"a}dchen und Jungen aus differentieller Perspektive: Eine Reanalyse von vier empirischen Untersuchungen",

abstract = "This article presents results of a re-analysis of four quantitative empirical studies on geometrical reasoning and proof at the lower secondary level. It aims at identifying possible gender effects with respect to this competency. The re-analysis encompasses data of nearly 2800 students from grade 7 respectively grade 8. The results confirm those of some international studies and suggest only minor gender differences. They explain a comparably small amount of the variance in mathematical performance.",

author = "Aiso Heinze and Stephan Kessler and Sebastian Kuntze and Anke Lindmeier and Marianne Moormann and Kristina Reiss and Franziska Rudolph-Albert and Luzia Z{\"o}ttl",

year = "2007",

doi = "10.1007/BF03339049",

language = "Deutsch",

volume = "28",

pages = "148--167",

journal = "Journal fur Mathematik-Didaktik",

issn = "0173-5322",

publisher = "Springer Verlag",

number = "2",

}

Heinze, A, Kessler, S, Kuntze, S, Lindmeier, A, Moormann, M, Reiss, K, Rudolph-Albert, F & Zöttl, L 2007, 'Kann Paul besser argumentieren als Marie? Betrachtungen zur Beweiskompetenz von Mädchen und Jungen aus differentieller Perspektive: Eine Reanalyse von vier empirischen Untersuchungen', Journal fur Mathematik-Didaktik, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 148-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339049

Kann Paul besser argumentieren als Marie? Betrachtungen zur Beweiskompetenz von Mädchen und Jungen aus differentieller Perspektive: Eine Reanalyse von vier empirischen Untersuchungen. / Heinze, Aiso; Kessler, Stephan; Kuntze, Sebastian et al.
In: Journal fur Mathematik-Didaktik, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2007, p. 148-167.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Kann Paul besser argumentieren als Marie? Betrachtungen zur Beweiskompetenz von Mädchen und Jungen aus differentieller Perspektive

T2 - Eine Reanalyse von vier empirischen Untersuchungen

AU - Heinze, Aiso

AU - Kessler, Stephan

AU - Kuntze, Sebastian

AU - Lindmeier, Anke

AU - Moormann, Marianne

AU - Reiss, Kristina

AU - Rudolph-Albert, Franziska

AU - Zöttl, Luzia

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This article presents results of a re-analysis of four quantitative empirical studies on geometrical reasoning and proof at the lower secondary level. It aims at identifying possible gender effects with respect to this competency. The re-analysis encompasses data of nearly 2800 students from grade 7 respectively grade 8. The results confirm those of some international studies and suggest only minor gender differences. They explain a comparably small amount of the variance in mathematical performance.

AB - This article presents results of a re-analysis of four quantitative empirical studies on geometrical reasoning and proof at the lower secondary level. It aims at identifying possible gender effects with respect to this competency. The re-analysis encompasses data of nearly 2800 students from grade 7 respectively grade 8. The results confirm those of some international studies and suggest only minor gender differences. They explain a comparably small amount of the variance in mathematical performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880823093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF03339049

DO - 10.1007/BF03339049

M3 - Artikel

AN - SCOPUS:84880823093

SN - 0173-5322

VL - 28

SP - 148

EP - 167

JO - Journal fur Mathematik-Didaktik

JF - Journal fur Mathematik-Didaktik

IS - 2

ER -

Kann Paul besser argumentieren als Marie? Betrachtungen zur Beweiskompetenz von Mädchen und Jungen aus differentieller Perspektive: Eine Reanalyse von vier empirischen Untersuchungen

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this